No "clinical decision" exemption from best interests
Housing delivery stalling - role of local authorities
Bus franchising: what next
Newsletter registration
News
News
News
TfL appoints 19 firms to £120m legal services panel
Council moves to scrap 1930s bye-laws
Features
Transparency and the scope of PD12R FPR 2010
The Mental Health Act 2025: key changes
The End of “Cheshire West”? Deprivation of Liberty, Consent and Capacity in the Supreme Court
The Welsh Language and the Court of Protection
Revisiting Cheshire West
Transparency in the Court of Protection
How AI could rewrite homelessness law
Mental health tribunals and 11(7) representatives
PFI – a new era?
PFI - A New Era?
The final say
Abbasi and Haastrup: to name or not to name
Transfers from hospital to social care
Court of Protection case update: April 2025
Issuing proceedings in best interests cases
Court of Protection case law update: March 2025
Homelessness and health
Capacity, insight and professional cultures
Court of Protection update: February 2025
Features
Planning appeals and costs awards
Refusal of planning applications against officers’ advice
The latest Sizewell C JR
Accelerating the planning appeals process: unintended consequences
The draft NPPF consultation: what’s new
Development, flood risk and planning judgment
Timed out?
The Mayor of London's strategic planning role
Infrastructure consenting in Wales
Grey belt tests tested
Releasing stalled housing sites
The planning permission for the new Chinese Embassy
Promptness in bringing judicial review claims
Hillside: Three years on
Mobile homes and separate planning units
Airport expansion, EIAs and emissions
Calculation of Biodiversity Net Gain
Caravan site licensing and planning control
Is there a discretion to extinguish CIL?
Article 4 Directions in Wales
Features
Low traffic neighbourhoods in London and local implementation plans
Rights of way, the definitive map and statement and interpreting public documents
Section 58 defences and reactive systems
Highways, kerbs and intervention levels
No liability for sap falling on the public highway
Where now for the ‘right’ to park?
High Court on highway widths
Imposing the brakes on car cruising
Aarhus cost protection in traffic order challenges
The section 58 defence in the Highways Act 1980
The statutory duty under s.41 Highways Act 1980
Time limits and CIL
Cross-examination in judicial review
Take it to the bridge
Removal of neighbourhood traffic schemes
Applications for a liability order enforcing CIL
Bus franchising reform – on the road to change?
Defending cycling pothole claims
Highway to Homes
Obstruction of the highway
Webinars
NHS Legal Framework Webinar Series - Masterclass on NHS Continuing Care for Adults and Children
Webinars
The Planning and Infrastructure Bill – what’s in, what’s out and will it work?
Webinars
Local Authority Insight Series: Making Highways Fit for the Future
Sponsored articles
Unlocking legal talent
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Local Authorities Invited to Specialist Training on Judicial Review Risks in Planning Decisions - 4-5 Gray's Inn Square
Planning officers and legal teams across multiple local authorities are being invited to attend a specialist training webinar on Judicial Review (JR) risks in planning, taking place on 14 April.
The session, titled “Judicial Review in Planning: Managing Risk in Permissions, Refusals and Enforcement Decisions,” will provide a practical and timely overview of how JR challenges arise within the planning system and what authorities can do to minimise exposure to legal challenge.
Judicial review remains one of the most significant legal risks facing planning authorities, particularly in decisions involving permissions, refusals, enforcement action and development plan policies. The training will focus on how and why claims are brought, the latest trends in planning litigation, and the common grounds of challenge relied upon by claimants.
Participants will also gain insight into the procedural pitfalls that most often lead to successful challenges, as well as strategies to strengthen decision-making processes and improve the defensibility of planning decisions.
The webinar will be delivered by Vivienne Sedgley and Ben Scantlebury, both barristers at 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, who bring extensive experience in planning law and judicial review litigation.
The session is designed for planning officers, enforcement teams, policy planners, and in-house legal advisers, offering practical guidance that can be directly applied to day-to-day decision-making.
By attending, local authorities will be better equipped to:
-
Identify and mitigate JR risk in planning decisions
-
Apply robust reasoning and procedural fairness
-
Avoid common legal pitfalls
-
Defend planning decisions if challenged
With judicial review continuing to shape the planning landscape, this focused training provides an important opportunity for authorities to build resilience and legal confidence in their planning functions.
Event Information
| Event Date | 14-04-2026 |
| Individual Price | Free |
24-03-2026
Online (live)
25-03-2026
London
25-03-2026
London
26-03-2026 5:00 pm
Online (live)
30-03-2026 11:00 am
Online (live)
30-03-2026 2:00 pm
Online (live)
31-03-2026 12:00 pm
Wales
02-04-2026 10:00 am
Online (live)
10-04-2026 10:00 am
Online (live)
13-04-2026
Online (live)
14-04-2026
Online (live)
Locums
Register for event alerts
On demand webinars
The A to Z of Housing Discrimination Case Law - Akerman-Livingstone v Aster
The A to Z of Housing Discrimination Case Law: Paragon Housing v Neville
The A to Z of Housing Discrimination Case Law: Nightingale v Bromford Housing
The A to Z of Housing Discrimination Case Law: Laidley v Metropolitan Housing Trust
Leaving care provisions demystified!
Chickens, Fish and Lobsters - how are they protected?
Interveners in financial remedy proceedings
Standish 18 months on
02-04-2026 10:00 am
24-03-2026
22-04-2026 11:00 am
01-07-2026 11:00 am

















