Judiciary calls on office holders to avoid “shouting” and treat others fairly in ‘expected behaviours’ list
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a list of expected behaviours for judicial office holders, which includes a call to avoid "shouting or snapping" and to ensure that no one in a hearing room is exposed to bias or prejudice.
The statement notes that treating people "fairly, with courtesy and respect" is reflected in the service's oath to "do right to all manner of people… without fear or favour, affection, or ill will."
"We all have a responsibility to help foster a positive working environment, where diversity is recognised and valued, and everyone is treated with dignity and respect," the statement continues.
It adds that judicial officeholders have a responsibility to help foster a positive working environment where diversity is recognised.
The statement then sets out a list of expected behaviours:
- treat others fairly and respectfully;
- be "mindful of the authority we have and be careful not to abuse it";
- be "aware of how our words and behaviour can affect others";
- remain patient and tolerant when encountering difficult situations;
- act professionally and courteously, including under pressure, and avoid shouting or snapping;
- aim to ensure that no one in a hearing room is exposed to any display of bias or prejudice;
- build effective working relationships with and support judicial colleagues and staff;
- welcome and support new colleagues; and
- be open to feedback "if we have done something that may have caused discomfort or offence".
The judiciary recommended anyone who has seen behaviour that conflicts with the listed expectations to raise it informally with the individual concerned or with their leadership judge, magistrate or another leadership judge.
It noted that more formal routes are available through the Judicial Grievance or whistleblowing procedures or through making a report to the Judicial Conduct Investigation Office.
According to the judiciary, the statement "builds on, and does not replace" the Guide to Judicial Conduct; and makes it clear that the same standards of behaviour are expected between judicial office holders as they are towards staff and users.
Adam Carey
