Must read

The Practical impact of the Procurement Act 2023
– the challenges, the benefits and the legal lacunas
In the second of three articles for Local Government Lawyer on the Procurement
Act 2023 one year after it went live, Katherine Calder and Victoria Fletcher from
DAC Beachcroft consider some of its practical impact and implications, including
how to choose the right regime, how authorities are tackling the notice requirements,
considerations when making modifications, and setting and monitoring KPIs.
The Practical impact of the Procurement
Act 2023 – the challenges, the benefits
and the legal lacunas
Katherine Calder and Victoria Fletcher from DAC Beachcroft
consider some of its practical impact and implications,
including how to choose the right regime, how authorities
are tackling the notice requirements, considerations when
making modifications, and setting and monitoring KPIs.


Weekly mandatory food
waste collections
What are the new rules on food waste collections and why are
councils set to miss the March deadline? Ashfords’ energy
and resource management team explain.
Weekly mandatory food
waste collections
What are the new rules on food waste collections and why are
councils set to miss the March deadline? Ashfords’ energy
and resource management team explain.


The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On -
How procurement processes are evolving
Katherine Calder and Sarah Foster of DAC Beachcroft focus on
changes to procurement design at selection and tender stage in
three key areas of change that the Act introduced.
The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On -
How procurement processes are evolving
Katherine Calder and Sarah Foster of DAC Beachcroft focus on
changes to procurement design at selection and tender stage in
three key areas of change that the Act introduced.


Service charge recovery
and the Building Safety Act 2022
Zoe McGovern, Sian Gibbon and Caroline Frampton set out
what local authorities need to consider when it comes to
the Building Safety Act 2022 and service charge recovery.
Service charge recovery
and the Building Safety Act 2022
Zoe McGovern, Sian Gibbon and Caroline Frampton set out
what local authorities need to consider when it comes to
the Building Safety Act 2022 and service charge recovery.

Newsletter registration
Injunctions to restrain breaches of planning control
Who bears the burden?
Lawfulness and applications for a CLEUD
The OIA’s 2026 operating plan: What universities need to know
The Cardiff Airport subsidy control ruling
White Paper on SEN reforms: some lessons from the current Welsh SEN system
Greyhound racing and the separation of powers
CILEX and others v Mazur and others [2026] EWCA Civ 369
The Hillsborough Law Bill: implications for public bodies
Dispensing with notice to father
Court of Protection case update April 2026
The new PD27A: a step change in Family Court bundle and document management
Déjà Vu – the implications of Zenobē Energy’s latest case for local government
The ERA – Benefits and Working Conditions
£150m Clean Maritime Grant Competition Opens – Critical Subsidy Control Steps for Applicants
Failure by Employers to Keep Holiday Records Becomes a Criminal Offence From April 2026
Why I Wanted to Explore Intensity of Review Across the UK and New Zealand
Asylum hotels, overcrowding and the HMO rules
Practical impact of the Procurement Act 2023 – the challenges, the benefits and the legal lacunas
Intentional homelessness and tenancies obtained by false statement
Defective but not fatal
Self-grants of planning permission, functional separation and demolition avoidance
The lawfulness of emailing licensing decision notices
Intervention: the Monitoring Officer’s view
The role of the backbench councillor
FOI and information held on computer systems
Sentencing guidelines for HSE offences and public bodies
Correcting mistakes in public decision making
The Supreme Court on termination of JCT contracts
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Housing delivery stalling - role of local authorities
Renters’ Rights Act 2025 - what it means for local authorities
DOLS and Under 16s: Insights from Medway Council v A Father
The Local Power Plan: Putting Clean Power in Communities’ Hands
The powers of exclusion panels
Removal from kinship care
When school discipline meets disability
Navigating the expansion of foster care
Personal welfare deputies – Lawson and Mottram strikes back?
No "clinical decision" exemption from best interests
Local Government Reorganisation 2026
Adoption vs long-term fostering
Evolution of the academy trust and maintained school landscape
Care leavers and redaction of records
“Unusual facts and procedural irregularities”
Planning appeals and costs awards
Refusal of planning applications against officers’ advice
Land value and the principle of reality
The latest Sizewell C JR
Impecuniosity and other issues in credit hire claims
Anti-Money Laundering: Key Issues for Local Government Legal and Governance Teams
Arts and Culture, Community and Regeneration: The Two New Streamlined Subsidy Routes
Disclosure to the DBS
The CAT and the New Lottery Subsidy Control challenge
Gender-questioning children under draft KCSIE 2026
Accelerating the planning appeals process: unintended consequences
The convergence of DRS, Simpler Recycling and EPR
Reserve below-threshold contracts for UK or local suppliers under the 2026 Order
CMO Principle and Financial Assistance Further Clarified in Latest CAT Judgment on Subsidy Control
Make Europe Build Again – The EU Industrial Accelerator Act
Affordable housing funding news & unlocking S106 units
The Social and Affordable Housing Programme 2026–2036: new guidance
Housing case alert - February 2026
Residential developments: new section 106 delivery roadmap
The Renters Rights Act and social landlords
Assured tenancies: written statements and information sheets
The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On - How procurement processes are evolving
Book review: “Reforming lessons”
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
The draft NPPF consultation: what’s new
Mobile phones, AI and schools
Transparency in FII cases
Court documents and AI
Next steps for the LGPS after the access and fairness consultation
What is an Officer?
The High Court on the EHRC’s “interim update”
Substituted decision notices and contempt of court
Social media guidance for members
2026 in construction: a look ahead
Track allocation in housing disrepair claims
Withdrawing applications for care orders
Appropriate professional boundaries for teachers
Children under 16 and deprivation of liberty
A Welsh white leopard?
Conversion to an ‘empty’ MAT
Must read
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Fix it fast: How “Awaab’s Law” is forcing action in social housing
Housing management in practice: six challenges shaping the sector
Why AI must power the next wave of Social Housing delivery
Must read
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Sponsored articles
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Unlocking legal talent
Councils including Wolverhampton call for national inconsistencies in taxi licensing to be tackled
- Details
Councils have called for the introduction of more robust national taxi licensing standards, warning that inconsistent local regimes fuel “licence shopping”, undermine safeguarding and erode public confidence.
City of Wolverhampton Council – which has been at the heart of the debate about cross-border licensing as it has licensed some 50,000 private hire drivers, 96% of whom live outside the city – has meanwhile backed a national regime with uniform standards.
The calls come in response to a Transport Committee inquiry launched in July 2025, which asked for views about the current regulations which allow licensing authorities to apply their own standards.
The committee also asked for responses on ''cross-border licensing'', which leads to authorities handing licences to drivers that operate outside of their areas.
The Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, has previously called for an end to the controversial practice, after pointing out that almost half of the taxis operating in the city held out-of-area licences.
In its written evidence to the committee, Wolverhampton said it is "clear that the current licensing regime needs to change", adding that the council's key priority was the protection and safety of the public.
On cross-border licensing, Wolverhampton said it supported a national regime with uniform standards, arguing that it would reduce the appeal of drivers looking outside their local authority for licences.
It added: "The current licensing system does not allow licensing authorities such as Wolverhampton to reject drivers or applications unless they are not fit and proper or do not meet other very limited criteria.
"The council has done a lot to try and mitigate the potential impact of the large number of drivers/operators who have applied to the council for licenses but critically it cannot choose to reject applications for a lack of connection with our city, and it is also important to note that licensing authorities cannot use licensing income for other purposes, and cannot make a surplus on the fees."
It warned against implementing minimum standards instead of national standards, as variation in standards across the country would encourage "license shopping".
Elsewhere, Wolverhampton said legislative changes should be made in order to give licensing authorities the power to suspend a licence pending investigation - and magistrates and crown courts should be empowered to revoke and suspend licences at the point of sentencing.
It also called for licensing officers to be handed powers to suspend other licensing authorities' licences, "to prevent the driver continuing to work on a ‘back up’ licence held elsewhere".
Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) - in collaboration with the area's 10 licensing authorities – meanwhile issued a response criticising the “inconsistent” licensing standards across authorities.
In April Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, called for taxi licensing powers to be handed to Mayoral Combined Authorities.
In its written evidence, TfGM said the current system creates “confusion", "undermines public confidence", and complicates the process for raising concerns or complaints.
“National harmonisation of standards presents a valuable opportunity for greater consistency, improved public confidence and improved support across the sector”, it added.
However, TfGM also warned the success of a national scheme “depends on the reasonableness and appropriateness of those standards, and most importantly on their implementation and ensuring compliance with them”.
The Local Government Association (LGA) meanwhile voiced support for national standards on safeguarding, a national database for drivers, and national enforcement powers for the trade.
Its response made particular mention of the findings of Baroness Casey's report into child exploitation, which the LGA said "clearly [demonstrated] the crucial role licensing authorities must play in safeguarding and has highlighted concerns around out of area working".
The LGA said: "The Government should introduce more robust national minimum standards on safeguarding to improve consistency and ensure all drivers are subject to high standards. This should be supported by the development of a national database of all licensed taxi/PHV drivers, vehicles and operators to facilitate greater information sharing between partners and assist with safeguarding, as well as national enforcement powers accompanied by additional resources to enable licensing officers to take action against any driver operating in their area."
The LGA also called for the urgent introduction of a comprehensive Taxi and PHV Licensing Reform Bill to replace the current "outdated" legislation.
The Transport Committee’s inquiry is ongoing.
Adam Carey
Qualified Lawyer
Trainee Solicitor
Lawyer / Senior Lawyer
Locums
Poll
22-04-2026 11:00 am
01-07-2026 11:00 am









