Local Government Reorganisation 2026
Must read
The Employment Rights Act 2025: What Public Sector Employers Need to Know
Must read
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Fix it fast: How “Awaab’s Law” is forcing action in social housing
Housing management in practice: six challenges shaping the sector
Why AI must power the next wave of Social Housing delivery
Sponsored articles
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Unlocking legal talent
County issues legal threat following delayed reorganisation decision
- Details
The Leader of West Sussex County Council has said the local authority may consider launching a judicial review of the Government’s approach to local government reorganisation in Sussex, following a delay to a final decision.
The Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government (MHCLG) was scheduled to confirm which unitary authorities would be formed in Sussex last month.
However, in a meeting between the department and the leaders and chief executives of Sussex councils last month (25 March), ministers said they planned to defer the final decision until the summer.
The Government will also conduct a short, technical consultation on modifications to the proposals after local elections.
In a statement issued the same day as the meeting, West Sussex said that it appeared as though the Government planned to discount the council's preferred option for a single unitary covering West Sussex.
MHCLG has not yet confirmed its preferred approach to reorganisation in Sussex.
Speaking at a full council meeting on 27 March, the leader of West Sussex, Paul Marshall, claimed the Government appeared to wish to "reshape Sussex based on Brighton and Hove's agenda".
He also alleged that the Government had ignored its own devolution paper and the framework for reorganisation that it proposed.
He said that the council "will engage" with the new consultation, but added: "If we find that the Government makes a decision on a model that is completely out of kilter with the devolution framework without any due diligence or that demonstrates an ability to deliver services, then we will consider a judicial review."
Cllr Marshall later said the reorganisation timetable would now prove "enormously challenging and unlikely to be a deliverable model, because there is no due diligence done on it".
"The two models that were submitted were done with due diligence and with clear opportunities of what that programme looked like for implementation," he added.
The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has been approached for comment.
Adam Carey
Lawyer (Contract, Procurement & Licensing)
Court of Protection and Inquest Lawyer
Head of Audit and Risk
Senior Solicitor - Adult Social Care
Trainee Solicitor
Senior Lawyer - Commercial & General
Senior Solicitor - Planning & Highways
Solicitor/Lawyer - Planning
Solicitor/Lawyer - Children's Social Care
Governance Lawyer
Head of Audit and Risk
Trainee Solicitor
Governance Lawyer
Locums
Locum roles
Poll
30-04-2026 5:00 pm
Online (live)
07-05-2026 10:00 am
Online (live)
08-05-2026
London
11-05-2026
London
11-05-2026 10:00 am
Online (live)
14-05-2026
Online (live)
14-05-2026
London
14-05-2026 4:00 pm
Online (live)
18-05-2026 9:00 am
Online (live)
25-06-2026 4:00 pm
24-09-2026 4:00 pm
On Demand











