That ADR Feeling
The Independent Review of Administrative Law and the Civil Justice Council review of Pre-Action Protocols need to highlight the tangible benefits that can be derived from the greater promotion and use of ADR within the current administrative law system, writes John Pugh-Smith.
In this episode John Pugh-Smith considers this topic in the context of the current round of consultation on changes to the Judicial Review: the Government commissioned Faulks’ Independent Review of Administrative Law (which closed on 26th October) and the Civil Justice Council’s review of Pre-Action Protocols (which opened on 27th October and closes on 18th December). He also considers, by way of example, the case of R (on the application of Janice Hemms) v Bath & North East Somerset Council & Kate Chubb [2020] EWHC 2721 (Admin), a recent decision of Sir Ross Cranston, former Head off the Administrative Court, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge.
About the speaker
|
John Pugh-Smith John Pugh-Smith’s principal practice area is town and country planning with related environmental, real estate, local government and parliamentary work. He is also an experienced alternative dispute resolver and facilitator. |
|
Latest Webinars
The Planning and Infrastructure Bill – what’s in, what’s out and will it work?
Devolution and Local Government Reorganisation: the planning perspective
Procurement Act 2023 webinar: Key Update
Public Law Update Webinar
Inquiry Law webinar series — Session 3: Challenging (& Challenge Proofing) Inquiries
Inquiry Law webinar series - Session 2: Issues of Evidence
NHS Legal Framework Webinar Series - Masterclass on NHS Continuing Care for Adults and Children
Homelessness and Social Housing Allocations (Wales) Bill: all change?
Property Nuts and Bolts (Part 5) – Disrepair claims and counterclaims
