Supreme Court to rule on costs orders against councils in care proceedings
- Details
The Supreme Court will this week hand down a judgment on the correct approach to be taken to ordering costs against public authorities in fact-finding hearings in care proceedings.
In the case of T (Children), the respondents were interveners in a fact-finding hearing in care proceedings brought by the appellant local authority.
After they were exonerated at the end of the fact-finding hearing, they applied for costs. The trial judge refused.
The respondents successfully appealed, with the Court of Appeal deciding that the trial judge had misapplied the law.
Cafcass and the Grandparents’ Association intervened at the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court is expected to issue its ruling on Wednesday (25 July).
Related Articles
Public Law Case Update Q2 2025
11-09-2025
Late costs budgets and sanctions
04-09-2025
Epping Forest in the Court of Appeal
03-09-2025
Must read
Local authority legal teams after Mazur
Local authority legal teams will need to review their practices and work allocation in the wake of Mazur, but there is no need for panic writes Timothy Leader.
Antisocial Behaviour Legal Officer
£35,833 per annum, rising to £37,356 after probation
Regulatory/Litigation Lawyer
£46,498 - £59,145 depending on skills and experience.
Locums
Poll




