GLD Vacancies

SPOTLIGHT

A zero sum game?

The number of SEND tribunal cases is rising and the proportion of appeals ‘lost’ by local authorities is at a record high. Lottie Winson talks to education lawyers to understand the reasons why, and sets out the results of Local Government Lawyer’s exclusive survey.

Council agrees to address its lack of suitable school transport for children with Special Needs

Buckinghamshire County Council has agreed to review the transport it has available to take children with Special Educational Needs to school, after the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGO) found that it left one mother out of pocket when she had no alternative but to take her child to school every day.

According to the mother, she was only paid for two legs of her daily journeys to her child’s special school when Buckinghamshire council told her it did not have the right transport, because of the child’s specific needs.

The child, who has sensory difficulties and high levels of anxiety, was eligible for free school transport to get to the school eight miles away. But instead of paying the mother for all four legs of the daily journeys, the mother only received half the amount.

The mother, who also has another child with Special Educational Needs, complained through the council’s appeal process, but this was flawed. It communicated poorly with her and demanded evidence it should have sought itself. And at one point it even requested information from the wrong school.

The Ombudsman’s investigation criticised the way the council handled the appeal, which was delayed. It found there was not enough evidence to support the council’s claimed actions during the delay period.

Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said: “This case raises the question of whether the child was actually in receipt of the free transport they were eligible for, if the mother was out of pocket, and had no option but to provide it.

“I am concerned the council does not have sufficient transport provision that they have a statutory duty to provide, so I have asked it to review its current services to see where improvements can be made.

“I hope that by agreeing to carry out this recommendation, the council will ensure no other families are affected in future.”

In this case, the council has agreed to reimburse the mother for the mileage for the return journeys from September 2018 and pay for all four legs of the journey going forward.

Buckinghamshire says they also apologised and will pay her £50 for each week she took the children to school from September 2018 in recognition of the time, trouble and anxiety it caused. The council will pay this until it can provide alternative transport for the children or, if at that point, the mother confirms she is happy to cover the additional cost of two legs.

Buckinghamshire will also assess the mother’s second child to consider whether it can provide suitable alternative transport, if it cannot do so, it should pay all four legs of the journeys.

A review of its school transport policy and guidance to ensure it reflects its statutory duty to provide free transport will also take place, according to the council. It will pay the full costs of transport to parents where it is unable to provide suitable transport. But if the parent can provide transport and voluntarily agrees to a mileage arrangement, this will cover two legs of the journey.

The council will also review other parents’ and carers’ mileage arrangements, and if it finds other parents are similarly affected, it should pay the mileage costs for all four legs of the journey and take action to address its apparent lack of suitable transport provision for children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities.

In a joint statement Anita Cranmer, Buckinghamshire Council Cabinet Member for Education and Skills and David Martin, Buckinghamshire Council Cabinet Member for Logistics said: “The Council is committed to supporting all of our children and young people, whatever challenges they may face, to have equal opportunity to achieve their potential and enjoy better learning and lives.

“The Council has accepted the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s findings that in this case there has been a failure in the application of our processes, resulting in hardship for the family. We have apologised to the family and made full payment in accordance with the Ombudsman’s recommendation. We are working to finalise the other recommendations and will ensure these are completed within the required timescales.”

Adam Carey