Local Government Lawyer

Sponsored articles

LGL Red line

PD51Z, case law update and proposals for space furlough and insolvency protection

Michael Walsh, Daniel Dovar, Jonathan Upton and Piers Harrison discuss PD51Z and Arkin v Marshall, the Supreme Court’s decision in Duval and proposals for space furlough and insolvency protection.
 

About the presenters

Landmarks health and social care 3

 Michael Walsh

Michael’s expertise encompasses all aspects of the law of property, commercial and chancery work.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Sarah Sutherland

Daniel Dovar

Daniel specialises in real property and leasehold law with an emphasis on landlord and tenant.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Landmarks health and social care 1

Jonathan Upton

Jonathan Upton specialises in property disputes.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Piers Harrison

Piers Harrison

Piers’s practice covers all areas of property law. He enjoys litigation. He is particularly experienced in leasehold enfranchisement.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Related Articles
COVID-19 related checks and proposals: pitfalls, tips and an update
04-06-2020
Property in quarantine: regulation of the private rented sector
06-05-2020
Cut your neighbour down to size?
06-07-2021
Hurstwood v Rossendale Borough Council - Property Case Law Update
14-06-2021
Enforcing & escaping property transactions - contractual termination, rescission & specific performance
10-06-2020

Latest Webinars

Interveners in financial remedy proceedings

To continue our current family law webinar series, Andrew and Catrin discuss practical tips for intervener claims in financial remedy proceedings – how to identify them, case management, preparing documentation and costs considerations.

Standish 18 months on

Paul Pavlou and Anne Hogarth revisit the case of Standish v Standish 18 months on, examining the judgment’s impact on financial remedy practice and emerging judicial trends, as well as presenting a general case law update.