Winchester Vacancies

SPOTLIGHT

A zero sum game?

The number of SEND tribunal cases is rising and the proportion of appeals ‘lost’ by local authorities is at a record high. Lottie Winson talks to education lawyers to understand the reasons why, and sets out the results of Local Government Lawyer’s exclusive survey.

New unitary accepts Ombudsman recommendations after predecessor council left boy with special needs without proper education

The newly formed Dorset Council has accepted a series of recommendations made by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman after a boy with autism was left without proper education for two years by one of its predecessor authorities.

According to the LGO, the former Dorset County Council failed to provide the boy with appropriate alternatives when it became clear mainstream school was not suitable for him.

The boy, who also has Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), started secondary school in the county in 2015.

“After two years of struggling with mainstream school, the council decided to try to find him an alternative placement. Throughout the period the boy’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan was not amended,” the Ombudsman said.

The boy’s parents complained about the amount of educational support their son was receiving, and it was arranged for him to attend a community farm. “However, it was discovered nine months later the farm was not Ofsted registered, putting him at risk of harm due to a lack of proper procedures in place.”

Two months after removing the boy from the farm, he was sent to a private setting for children with special needs and autism, but this did not have the level of registration needed to deliver full-time education.

Around two months later, the boy’s parents removed him from the setting because of concerns about the education it was delivering and the behaviour of other students, the LGO said.

The council put in place four hours' tuition a week, which only lasted a month. In April 2019, after the farm had received its registration, the boy returned for 15 hours a week and was given an additional three hours a week home tuition.

The Ombudsman’s investigation found the council:

  • failed to consider whether the boy needed an EHC needs assessment;
  • did not follow the annual review process correctly;
  • failed to arrange suitable alternative educational provision; and
  • was at fault for the way it handled the father’s complaint.

The LGO has recommended that Dorset Council:

  • apologise;
  • allocate £4,000 to be used for the boy’s educational benefit over and above that used to provide day-to-day support;
  • consult him and his parents on how this money should be spent;
  • pay the boy £1,000 for the distress its actions caused;
  • pay his parents a further £300 each to remedy the injustice they were caused;
  • hold a meeting to discuss the boy’s education with all relevant parties on how best to progress;
  • create and issue staff guidance about EHC needs assessments;
  • develop procedures to help staff when they need to identify and secure alternative provision; and
  • revise its local offer to include details of its alternative provision.

Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said: “From the start of secondary education in September 2015, the council should have kept the boy’s Education, Health and Care Plan under review. But despite multiple triggers, it did not even consider conducting a reassessment – leaving him with the same EHC Plan since primary school. 

“Consequently, the boy has been out of full-time education for two years, affecting his ability to take his GCSE exams and his future prospects. His father has told us his son has spent a considerable time isolated at home, setting back his education, increasing his anxiety and adversely affecting his confidence and independence.

“Unfortunately, this is not the first complaint we have upheld about the council’s provision for children with special educational needs: we have found fault on eight separate occasions since March 2018. I am concerned the council is not learning from these cases, and it suggests there are wider systemic issues that need to be addressed.

“I am pleased the new council has agreed to my recommendations, and commend the steps it is now making to address the problems I have found in this and earlier cases.”

Dorset Council said it was acting upon the recommendations in the report and “also working hard to improve the way it supports children and families with SEND – including investing in, and securing more, alternative education provision in Dorset for children with complex needs”.

Cllr Andrew Parry, portfolio holder for children, education and early help at Dorset Council, said: “We fully accept the Ombudsman’s findings and apologise to the family for the stress and disruption caused, particularly to the young person involved. Improving our SEND services is a priority for the new Dorset Council. We have a new director and new head of education & learning and are working with schools to provide more alternative education for children with additional needs in Dorset. We’re also reviewing our internal processes to improve the way we support families. We have a lot of work to do but we’re determined to make things better for children and families.”

Cllr Parry added: “Like other councils, we’re in a situation where the funding we receive from Government just doesn’t match the increasing demand. We have been pushing MPs for more money, so our children and young people can receive the support they need and deserve.”

As well as acting upon all the recommendations within the report, the council said it would also continue with its own improvement plan.