Top-up fees: a growing risk for councils
Prohibitions orders, assessments and the HSSRS
Highways, kerbs and intervention levels
Local government reorganisation and historic liabilities
The status of co-opted members
Open Justice Principle – Where are the lines drawn in care proceedings?
What's the best way to manage conflict between colleagues in schools and colleges?
Scrutiny of professionals working in Children Act litigation
Teacher dismissed after joking about 'whacking' a pupil: was the decision fair?
Fear of harm and plans for adoption
Electronic and workplace balloting for statutory union ballots
Issues Resolution Hearings, threshold criteria and adequacy of reasons
Foster carers and manifestation of religious belief
Contempt, disclosure failures, and information governance
The ‘Hillsborough Law’, senior leaders and prevention of critical harm
Hoarding and learning from inquests – safeguarding to prevent tragic outcomes
Judging the use of AI
The Hammad appeal – Housing authority responses to homelessness in England and Wales
Natural justice and costs in the Court of Protection
The Procurement Act 2023: 10 months on, how is it going?
Costs, detailed assessment and misconduct
Airport expansion, EIAs and emissions
Boosting localised procurement - Reform to Section 17 LGA 1988
The Autumn Budget and Public-Private Partnerships
Calculation of Biodiversity Net Gain
The new National Licensing Policy Framework
The Social and Affordable Homes Programme: key points
Caravan site licensing and planning control
From 1925 to 2025
Licence revocation appeals and a change in circumstances
Self-neglect and capacity
Renewal of telecoms leases and building safety regulation
Procurement Act 2023: Anticipating and avoiding procurement disputes
Access injunctions: legal pathways to forced access and decants
Preparing for heat network regulation: timelines, obligations, and next steps
The lost enforcement of section 21
Housing case alert - November 2025
Section 21 - It’s not over yet
Expert evidence in housing conditions claims
Inquests and Housing
Wolverhampton Traveller injunctions – where are we now?
Is there a discretion to extinguish CIL?
Balancing public interest and planning control – accommodation of asylum seekers
Meaning of father in s2 Children Act 1989
A “43 moment” for the local government workforce
Section 193 LPA 1925: public access to commons and waste land
Growing apart?
Political and mayoral assistants
PFI expiry and employees
Welsh-medium inquests and the death register
The future of housing: What procurement and contracts teams need to know
No liability for sap falling on the public highway
Weapons in Cardiff educational settings: new guidance for schools
Public Sector High Court Litigation in 2025: Key trends so far
Enjoying the challenge
Abandoning procurements: risky business
The surge in Subsidy Control litigation
Dispersal of asylum seekers
Causation and being “homeless intentionally”
Strengthening the standards and conduct framework for local authorities in England
Facts still very much matter
Court of Appeal rules on exclusions once again
Faith-based oversubscription criteria
How to place children abroad after Re M
Fact finding in the Court of Protection
Discrimination arising from disability: did a school discriminate against a pupil when it excluded her?
Care cases involving multiple allegations
SEND and pupils absent due to health needs
Granting of parental responsibility
Confidentiality clauses and severance payments in FE colleges and Academy Trusts
The importance of an adequate mortgagee exclusion clause
Managing AI Risks in Local Government
Reconciling Conflicting Private and Public Interests on Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects
Subsidy Control – top tips for public authorities referring measures to the CMA's Subsidy Advice Unit
Awaab’s Law and Fitness for Human Habitation – the same, but different?
Daylight/sunlight material consideration for planning purposes
Article 4 Directions in Wales
Not all fun and games
Children law update - October 2025
Where now for the ‘right’ to park?
Zip-wires in caverns
Fix it fast: How “Awaab’s Law” is forcing action in social housing
Housing management in practice: six challenges shaping the sector
The Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016 and rent paid during periods of unfitness
From the front line of HMO licensing
Housing case alert: September/October 2025
Urgent Capital Support: the key points
- Details
Ciara Campfield sets out what schools, academies and trusts need to know about the Urgent Capital Support guidance 2025.
The Department for Education (DfE) published updated guidance back in June 2025 on Urgent Capital Support (UCS). This guidance outlines important changes that schools, academies, and sixth-form colleges need to be aware of when applying for emergency capital funding. We thought it was probably worthwhile reminding schools about the update, now that the school holidays are over and the new academic year has kicked in. Please see our Q&A below.
What is Urgent Capital Support (UCS)?
UCS is a funding mechanism designed to help:
- academies;
- sixth-form colleges; and
- voluntary Aided (VA) schools that do not receive School Condition Allocation (SCA) and are facing urgent building-related issues that may result in the closure of all or part of their site.
In short – UCS is for emergencies that cannot wait for the next round of the Condition Improvement Fund (CIF). It is not intended for planned maintenance or long-term capital improvement projects.
What are the key points in the Urgent Capital Support guidance?
- Funding is typically provided as a loan, with grants available only in exceptional cases (but we are aware of blended projects).
- Applications can be submitted at any point during the year.
- Institutions must show that the issue presents a real and immediate threat to health, safety, or educational continuity.
What’s new in the guidance?
The core purpose of UCS remains the same, but the 2025 update introduces a more structured and rigorous framework. Key changes:
Introduction of defined categories (A–G)
Applicants must now classify their urgent issue under one of the following categories:
- Structural failure
- Asbestos risks
- Electrical faults
- Fire protection issues
- Other critical safety threats
Sustainability requirements
Applicants must show alignment with the government’s net-zero goals, referencing:
- The Output Specification 2022; and
- environmental impact considerations.
Stricter financial scrutiny
- Applications must now include a detailed financial commentary.
- Evidence of reserve levels and funding commitments is required.
Loan-first model
- The default funding method is a loan.
- Grant funding is reserved for only the most exceptional circumstances .
Post-approval monitoring
- Approved projects must submit monthly progress updates.
- Completion documentation is now mandatory to avoid clawback.
Are you eligible for UCS?
To be eligible, you must:
- Not receive School Condition Allocation (SCA)
- Be facing an urgent condition issue that poses a risk to safety or continuity
- Demonstrate that the issue cannot wait for CIF
- Have a clear understanding of your organisation’s financial position and ability to fund a loan
What do I need to show in my application?
Your application must include the following:
- An independent condition report
- Supporting evidence of suitability issues
- A financial health assessment
- A project funding template
- A feasibility study, if applicable
Final thoughts
The 2025 UCS guidance raises the bar for emergency capital funding. Schools and trusts must be well-prepared, evidence-led, and financially clear when applying linking it clearly to the requirements of the Guidance. It seems that aligning with sustainability goals and meeting new reporting standards will be critical to a successful bid.
Ciara Campfield is a partner and Head of Business and Social Enterprise at Stone King.






