Local Government Lawyer Home Page


Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).

 

                                                                                                  

Slide background

Insolvency – Termination and Beyond

<a href=Rachel Murray-Smith and Clare Mendelle consider the potential warning signs of, and the compliant manner for dealing with, contractor insolvency.

The Employer instructed a Contractor to design and build a small multi-use community centre. The project started well but a quarter of the way through standards started to slip. The Clerk of Works and Employer’s Agent began to notice workmanship issues on site and a delay in certain activities being completed. The project is now halfway through, and it has become clear that the Contractor is in financial difficulties.

Background

An SME contractor (the “Contractor”) was appointed under the JCT Design & Build 2016 (unamended form) (the “Contract”) to construct a small multi-use community centre. The relationship between the employer (the “Employer”) and Contractor at the outset was positive with everyone feeling optimistic about the benefits that the centre would bring to those who lived in the area. However, by week 16 of the 16-month programme, the Employer’s Agent and Clerk of Works had both noticed a slip in terms of the standard of workmanship. The Contractor had changed the bricks to be used to a cheaper and more readily available type.

In addition, the brickwork itself was not up to the expected standards. The Employer’s Agent raised these issues with the Contractor and its site manager gave lots of assurances that the issues would be addressed, and that workmanship would improve. The Employer, having taken the Employer’s Agent’s advice, was keen to cultivate and maintain a good working relationship with the Contractor and, therefore, accepted the change to the brick type and the assurances that the workmanship issues would be rectified. No formal notification regarding these matters was issued to the Contractor.

Despite the earlier reassurances, issues continued to arise on site which were, again, largely dealt with through the issuing of informal warnings and multiple requests for the workmanship to improve. In addition to the workmanship issues, the Employer and Employer’s Agent noticed that, over the coming weeks, the number of personnel on site was significantly less than expected. By week 30, the Employer’s Agent had heard from a contractor on another project that it was managing that the Contractor was in financial difficulties.

This provided a potential explanation for the limited number of personnel on site. In addition, only the week before the site manager had made a poor excuse as to why some materials, which were due on site, had not been delivered. The Employer’s Agent mentioned this to the Employer who was very concerned by this news. Before the Employer could fully consider the options available the news arrived in week 32 that the Contractor had gone into administration; a few days later the Employer received the notice of appointment of an administrator. The Employer immediately proceeded to terminate under clause 8.5.1 of the Contract. The Employer wanted to ensure that the notice of termination arrived with the Contractor immediately, and so the notice was first sent via email and then by first-class post for completeness.

Termination for Insolvency

The majority of Employers will seek to terminate in such circumstances. It is critical that all of the required procedural steps are followed to ensure that the termination is valid.

The Employer must:

  • Check that it has the requisite ground(s) to terminate. Clause 8.1 provides a very broad definition of insolvency and so it is likely it will apply in most instances of formal financial distress. However, this must be checked, and it is important to confirm in the notice of termination the limb of clause 8.1 which applies. In this scenario, clause 8.1.1 applied.
  • Be mindful of the applicable notice period depending on the clause under which they are terminating. Termination for insolvency under clause 8.5.1 takes effect from the date of service of the notice of termination (i.e., immediately).
  • Check the service requirements. Clause 8.2.3 confirms that “Each notice referred to in this section shall be given in accordance with clause 1.7.4.” Clause 1.7.4 requires that the notice must be “delivered by hand or sent by Recorded Signed For or Special Delivery post.” The Employer, therefore, did not validly serve its termination notice in this scenario and is in repudiatory breach of contract. A repudiatory breach of contract entitles the other party to either accept the repudiation (i.e., end the contract) or to affirm it (i.e., continue the contract). In either case, the other party is also entitled to claim damages. The Employer here could, if it discovers its mistake quickly, re-issue the notice of termination taking care to ensure that it complies with all applicable notice provisions. In so doing it will limit the damages, if any, that the Contractor will suffer and be able to claim.
  • Check that the notice of termination is served on the correct address. In accordance with clause 1.7.3 this will be one of the following:
    • The address stated in the Contract Particulars or such other address as the recipient may from time to time notify to the sender. In respect of the latter, caution should be exercised to ensure that such an address change has been formally notified to enable reliance upon it.
    • If no such address is current, the recipient’s last known principal business address or (where a body corporate) its registered or principal office.
    • If there is any doubt regarding the address, consideration should be given to serving to more than one address.

Steps Following Termination

Here is a practical checklist for Employers, to assist in terms of next steps upon termination:

  • Take back possession of the site (as entitled by clause 8.7.1) and secure the site and the materials on it. This will enable the Employer to manage the Contractor’s return to site, pursuant to clause 8.7.2.1, to remove materials and goods that belong to it. It will also prevent any unauthorised access by sub-contractors (who may be owed money) from accessing the site to remove items.
  • Immediately check the forms of financial security provided under the contract: parent company guarantee, performance bond and/or sub-contractor warranties. Is it possible to make a claim under any of these forms? It is important to remember in respect of the forms of financial security that they must specifically cater for insolvency for you to call on them.
  • Familiarise yourself with – and follow – the relevant termination provisions, including the specific termination final account process.

The background to the scenario detailed a number of performance issues on site. The Employer in this scenario elected to deal with these informally. Performance issues can be an indicator of and precursor to financial distress. In addition to the obvious reasons to deal with such issues formally and in accordance with the Contract, it may also provide the Employer with grounds to terminate under clause 8.4 (Default by Contractor).

This termination right may arise prior to a formal insolvency scenario. Formal records of such matters will also be critical when valuing the works for the purposes of the termination final account, particularly where the Employer has had to otherwise instruct another contractor to rectify defects under clause 2.35. If, as in this scenario, materials do not arrive on site immediately, check if they have been designated as Listed Items or if there are any specific amendments to the terms which enable you to withhold payment until such time as materials are delivered. Proactive management of the Contract is essential and will invariably put the Employer in a better position should an issue such as insolvency arise.

Rachel Murray-Smith is a partner and Clare Mendelle a Professional Support Lawyer at Sharpe Pritchard LLP


For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act

FREE DOWNLOAD

LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive

BUY NOW

  More Articles

<a href=

Environment Act 2021: What Does it Mean for Waste Authorities?

Sally Stock, Juli Lau, Ellen Painter and Beth Edwards discuss notable changes made to the Environment Bill 2021-2022, which received Royal Assent on the 9th November.
<a href=

ESG and its relevance to the public sector

Peter Collins and Sydney Chandler discuss the growing importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria in public procurement.
<a href=

JCT 101: Time and Punishment

Rachel Murray-Smith, Clare Mendelle and Laura Campbell discuss a common Construction scenario regarding the Practical Completion of a project, and the position under the unamended JCT DB 2016.
Icons Court

The importance of due process, communication and fairness in employee conduct investigations – what you need to know.

Julie Bann and James Hughes discuss the importance of fairness in employee conduct investigations, taking a look at the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham -v- Mr S Keable case.
<a href=

Becoming More Inclusive: VAT and the Public Procurement (Agreement on Government Procurement) (Thresholds) (Amendment) Regulations 2021

Juli Lau, Natasha Barlow and Beth Edwards examine the recently published Public Procurement Regulations 2021, focussing upon amendments to the thresholds within various procurement regimes.
<a href=

The LADs are Alright

Laura Campbell discusses liquidated damages in construction contracts, focussing upon the long-running Triple Point saga which ended in the Supreme Court this year.
<a href=

Procurement Policy Note 08/21

Juli Lau and Beth Edwards outline Procurement Policy Note 08/21, recently published by the Cabinet office.
Icons Court

Hard Times: Improving Air Quality with Clean Air Zones

Rob Hann and James Goldthorpe examine the introduction of Clean Air Zones to improve air quality across the UK.
<a href=

Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021 – What Public Bodies Need To Know

Rob Hann and James Hughes examine the Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021, looking at what Public Bodies need to know.
<a href=

Net Zero – What’s new for local authorities?

Steve Gummer and Sophie Drysdale look at two major climate publications: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and the Net Zero Strategy.
Icons Hazard

Jumping to conclusions: Final Statements, liquidated damages and material breaches of natural justice

Michael Comba looks at a recent Technology and Construction Court case that provides useful guidance on the JCT’s procedural requirements on disputing Final Statements.
Icons Court

Three times one equals one: Several disputed payment applications amount to a single dispute

Michael Comba considers a case in which the High Court dismissed an employer’s argument that an adjudicator lacked jurisdiction because the referral concerned three separate payment applications and, therefore, comprised three separate disputes.
<a href=

Warm feelings or hot air: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and Heat Networks

This week the government published its Heat and Buildings Strategy (Strategy). This contained vital innovations and essential step changes in terms of how heating is provided, writes Steve Gummer.
<a href=

Procurement reforms: update from Cabinet Office

Rob Hann, Nicola Sumner and Juli Lau assess the Cabinet Office's update on the progress of the government's public procurement reforms.
Icons Court

Bond, Performance Bond. Delivering value for the Public Sector?

Justin Mendelle examines whether public sector clients achieve value for money from the provision of performance bonds.
Icons Hazard

Not so personal messages: R. (on the application of Good Law Project Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and Abingdon Health Plc [2021] EWHC 2595 (TCC)

Nicola Sumner, Juli Lau and Beth Edwards look at The Good Law Project's challenge of the direct award by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care of three contracts for the production and supply of rapid Covid-19 antibody tests (the “Contracts”).
Icons Court

Settlement agreements – waiving Personal Injury claims

In the case of Farnham-Oliver v RM Educational Resources LTD, the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court allowed a Personal Injury claim (“PI claim”) to be pursued by an employee against his former employer despite the parties signing a Settlement Agreement in respect of an Employment Tribunal claim on the same issue. Julie Bann and James Hughes report.
Icons Hazard

Mandatory Vaccination for Care Home Workers in England – Update

Rachel Murray-Smith and Francesca Gallagher look at the detail of the government's guidance on compulsory vaccination for care staff.
<a href=

Make your mind up! Liquidated Damages clause upheld despite Employer’s challenge

In the recent case of Eco World Ballymore (EWB) v Dobler[1] , an Employer took the unusual position of challenging their own entitlement to liquidated damages (LDs) on the ground that the LDs provision constituted an unenforceable penalty clause. Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe investigate.
<a href=

Are Collateral Warranties Construction Contracts? Timing is Key.

Clare Mendelle and Anna Sidebottom examine the recently decided case of Toppan v Simply[1], which has provided guidance on when collateral warranties may be considered “construction contracts” under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 and so give the warranty holder the right to adjudicate.
Icons Court

Climate emergency or climate catastrophe?

Rob Hann asks how central & local government departments and councils can work together more effectively to combat the challenges to achieve net zero by 2050.
Icons Court

Big Problems Need Radical Solutions – Time to Play Monopoly with District Heating?

Steve Gummer examines how local authorities might make district heat networks a reality.
<a href=

The Judicial Review and Courts Bill

The Judicial Review and Courts Bill was introduced to the House last week on 21 July 2021. William Rose and Anna Sidebottom discuss the potential impact of the bill.
<a href=

Liquidated damages and termination

Clare Mendelle, Francesca Gallagher and James Goldthorpe provide an outline of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Triple Point Technology vs PTT Public Company Limited.

Mandatory Vaccination for Care Home Workers in England

The Government has announced that people working in care homes in England must be fully vaccinated against Covid-19 from October 2021, unless they have a medical exemption, write Rachel Murray-Smith and Francesca Gallagher.
Icons Court

Transparency in Procurement: Procurement Policy Note (“PPN”) 07/21

Julie Lau, Clare Mendelle and Beth Edwards outline the new regime for publishing procurement notices post-Brexit
Icons Court

When procurement law and contracts for interests in land meet

Colin Ricciardiello provides a case law update examining cases that have examined the overlap between a requirement to procure and a contract for the disposal of an interest in land.
tb w74 h74 crop int a734a5aec8e0dcb7849ee8ebeb84a53d

UK granted data protection adequacy decision

Charlotte Smith summarises the new data protection adequacy decision.

First Impressions on the New Subsidy Control Bill

Last week the Government published its new Subsidy Control Bill. The Bill represents a significant shift in the way in which subsidies are assessed and also provides some clarity about the regime that will replace the EU State aid regime, writes Peter Collins.
Icons Court

Managing new enforcement powers for councils under the Traffic Management Act 2004

Rob Hann considers the recent legislative changes to traffic management in England, including the introduction of Clean Air Zones and widening local authorities enforcement powers for moving traffic offences.
Icons Court

Implementing Net Zero: Taking account of Carbon Reduction Plans in the Procurement of Major Government Contracts

The Government recently published the Procurement Policy Note 06/21. This will require suppliers bidding for major government contracts to provide a Carbon Reduction Plan at the selection stage and commit to achieving Net Zero by 2050, writes Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe.
tb w74 h74 crop int a734a5aec8e0dcb7849ee8ebeb84a53d

Public Procurement Update June 2021

On 3 June 2021, the Government issued the National Procurement Policy Statement (NPPS), and the associated Procurement Policy Note (PPN). George Dale explains what each document does.

What a bind: Section 106 planning obligations where there are multiple land interests

Rachel Lee and Christos Paphiti consider whether the case of R (on the application of McLaren) v Woking Borough Council impacts upon local planning authorities (LPAs) ability to properly consider the land interests and parties as regards to performance of specific obligations.
Icons Court

The use of experts only works when everyone plays by the same rules

Colin Ricciardiello looks at the use of expert witnesses in the wake of an important recent decision.
Icons Court

Unlawful Award of Contract

The High Court has ruled that the Minister for the Cabinet Office, Michael Gove, broke the law by giving a contract to a market research company, Public First, who are run by long-time associates of his. Anna Sidebottom, Francesca Gallagher and Clare Mendelle report.
Icons Date

Time after time: extending time for determination of a prior approval application

Rachel Lee and Christos Paphiti examine the time period for determination of Prior Approval (‘PA’) applications and explore how a local authority can extend the time period for determination.
Slide background