Local Government Lawyer Home Page

Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).



Slide background

Transparency in Procurement: Procurement Policy Note (“PPN”) 07/21

Icons CourtJulie Lau, Clare Mendelle and Beth Edwards outline the new regime for publishing procurement notices post-Brexit

On 24th June, the Government issued PPN 07/21 (the “PPN”) relating to the publication of notices on Contracts Finder. The PPN is accompanied by the newly published “Guidance on the transparency requirements for publishing on Contracts Finder” (the “Guidance”) which must be applied by contracting authorities with immediate effect.

Part 1: Guidance applicable to all In-Scope Organisations

Part 1 of the Guidance replaces that previously published under PPN 07/16 and applies to all contracting authorities who must publish public sector opportunities on Contracts Finder under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (“PCR 2015”), excluding those listed in section 6 of Part 1 of the Guidance.

The requirements, which mostly stem from the PCR 2015, include:

  • Advertising most above-threshold contract opportunities on both Find-a-Tender Service (“FTS”) and Contracts Finder.
  • Publishing below-threshold public sector opportunities and contract award notices on Contracts Finder where they are worth at least £10,000 net of VAT (central government authorities), or at least £25,000 net of VAT (sub-central authorities and NHS Trusts).
  • Publishing contract opportunities on Contracts Finder within 24 hours of being advertised elsewhere, e.g. on FTS or other platforms.
  • The provision of specified information relating to procurement opportunities and awarded contracts. Further detail of these minimum publication requirements can be found in section 5 of Part 1 of the Guidance.
  • Publishing contract award notices on Contracts Finder within “a reasonable time” (as required within the PCR 2015), defined by the Guidance as follows:
  • For central government authorities, 30 calendar days after the contract award date.
  • For sub-central authorities, 90 calendar days after the contract award date.
  • Part 2: Additional policy guidance for central government authorities
  • Part 2 replaces the previous guidance “Publication of Central Government Tenders and Contracts” and applies exclusively to central government authorities as defined in Schedule 1 PCR 2015, excluding NHS Trusts.

The requirements include:

  • Providing unrestricted, free, and direct access to the tender documentation at the opportunity stage.
  • Publishing contract documents in full within 30 calendar days of award.
  • Following the Transparency Principles from PPN 01/17 (the “Principles”) (which were also updated on 24th June) by being proactive and releasing information during the life of the contract.
  • Considering where information should be exempted from disclosure or redacted under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“FOIA 2000”) and using exemptions or redactions appropriately.
  • Resolving extenuating circumstances which prevent the Guidelines from being followed as soon as reasonably practicable.

The Guidance also contains a number of annexes which provide helpful information:

  • Annex One – a summary of the requirements to publish on Contracts Finder;
  • Annex Two – FAQs on central government contracts; and
  • Annex Three – a flowchart on calculating timescales.

What has changed?

Notable changes brought about by the Guidance include the following:

  • References to OJEU and TED have been replaced by references to FTS.
  • “Contract award” for these purposes is defined as the date on which the contract is signed by the last contracting party, with timescales to publish running from the day after this date.
  • “Central Government” has been redefined so it aligns with the definition in Schedule 1 of the PCR 2015.
  • Executive Agencies and bodies for which central government authorities are responsible which are not explicitly listed in Schedule 1 of the PCR 2015 may be required by their relevant departments to follow Part 2, and central government authorities should encourage arms-length bodies and non-departmental public bodies to adopt the Guidance on a voluntary basis.
  • For consistency, details of contracts awarded by central government authorities must be published within 30 calendar days, instead of 20 days following the end of the ten-day standstill period (where applicable).
  • Clarification that if a deadline for publication falls on a non-working day, parties have until the end of the next working day to publish the relevant information.


The Cabinet Office states in the PPN that the purpose of issuing the Guidance is “to reflect changes following the end of the transition period and to provide further clarity to enable In-Scope Organisations to meet their transparency obligations.”

Transparency of procurement opportunities and visibility of awarded contracts are a key feature of the Green Paper “Transforming Public Procurement”. Meanwhile, the case of Good Law Project and Others v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care provides a recent example of contracting authorities continuing to fall foul of transparency requirements. Contracting authorities should therefore familiarise themselves with PPN 07/21, as it consolidates and clarifies existing rules, while also indicating the Government’s direction of travel in relation to transparency under the upcoming reformed procurement regime.

Julie Lau is a legal director, Clare Mendelle a professional support lawyer and Beth Edwards a paralegal at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.

For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act


LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive


  More Articles

Icons Document

Signet Trading Limited v First Property Group – First Award under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 Scheme

Joe Walker and James Nelson outline and analyse the first award under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 Scheme.
Icons Deal

Procurement reforms – implications for procurement challenges and remedies

Colin Ricciardello considers the implications for procurement challenges and remedies arising out of the Government's procurement reforms.
Icons House

Relationship between limitation act and scheme for construction contracts

David Owens and Natasha Barlow look at the implications of Hirst & Another v Dunbar & Others [2022] EWHC 41 (TCC)
Icons House

An Introduction to the Building Safety Act 2022

The Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) received Royal Assent in April 2022. Deborah Down outlines the main provisions.
Icons Date

Tackling Teckal – does the new Procurement Bill adequately deal with the Teckal exemption?

Peter Collins and Sophie Pilcher take a look at whether the new Procurement Bill adequately deals with the Teckal exemption
Icons Hazard

Local authorities on track to more freedom to cut ties with Russian and Belarusian suppliers

Juli Lau and Gonzalo Puertas discuss the increased freedom for Local Authorities to cut ties with Russian and Belarusian suppliers.
Icons Hazard

Nitrogen Credits Commentary

Emily Knowles, Bernadette Hillman and Steve Gummer discuss the impact of nitrate on planning permission and development in the UK.
Icons House

Thurrock Council & Another v Adams & Ors [2022] EWHC 1324 (QB)

William Rose, Partner at Sharpe Pritchard LLP, has successfully acted for Thurrock Council and Essex County Council in obtaining a ‘first of its kind’ injunction against individuals connected with the protest group Just Stop Oil.
Icons Date

The Adjudication Part 3: The Response and Further Submissions 9 June 2022

David Owens and James Goldthorpe look at the responding party's response and further submissions during adjudication.
Icons House

A renewable future: focusing energy solutions at a local level

Natasha Barlow and Steve Gummer discuss the 'Energy Trilemma' and how it is playing out at a local level.
Icons Date

Procurement Bill – Initial impressions from the first draft

Juli Lau and Sophie Mcfie-Hyland outline their initial impressions from the first draft of the Procurement Bill.
Icons Hazard

Let’s paint the town green! Government plans for green homes

Laura Campbell discusses the change urgently needed in towns and cities to make the landscape greener.
Icons House

The Queen’s Speech in Brief

The number of Bills which affect public sector clients is greater than usual – and the government have got straight off the starting blocks by publishing some of them already.
Icons Hazard

Refurbishment and Retrofitting: In with the old, out with the new!

Sharpe Pritchard analyse the challenge of decarbonising the construction sector.
Icons House

NET ZERO – What obligations are there on the UK to achieve it?

Radhika Devesher takes a look at the legal duty to achieve net-zero placed upon the UK.
Icons House

Championing green goals through public buying

Juli Lau considers how public purchasing power can be used to champion Net Zero goals, and how public procurement might be used as another driver for change.
Icons Hazard

Top Tips for Local Authority Lawyers advising on Data Protection Matters

Charlotte Smith and Hannah Peto set out some of their top tips to consider when advising on data protection matters.
Icons Court

The Cost of Freedom of Information – The Council’s Failure to Advise

Charlotte Smith and Nadia Ahmed summarise the case and judgement of Moss v Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames and another (NJ/2018/007).
Icons QA

Ask the team

These are frequently asked questions to our experts from colleagues in Local Government via the Sharpe Pritchard ask the team facility concerning local authority companies, partnerships, charging and trading.
Icons Court

A call to review public contracts with Russian suppliers

Juli Lau and Gonzalo Puertas discuss the first official document to consider public sector contracts with companies linked to the Russian and Belarusian state regimes, issued by the Cabinet Office.
Icons Date

A New NEC Option to tackle greenwashing in the construction industry

Allan Owen and Sophie Drysdale discuss 'greenwashing' in the construction industry and a new secondary option clause X29 for its NEC4 suite of contracts developed by NEC.
Icons House

The Pathway to the Future – The Road Map for Employment Tribunals

David Leach discusses and outlines the road map of the planned changes for modernising the Tribunals in 2022 and 2023 released by The Presidents of the Employment Tribunals.
Icons House

Farrar Out

Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe discuss how the insolvency of Farrar Construction leads to clarity from the Courts on dealing with an insolvent contractor under JCT.
Icons House

The UK government has this week introduced the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill

Peter Collins and Sophie Pilcher discuss the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill introduced by the UK Government this week.
Icons Hazard

A sweet truth for selectivity

Steve Gummer and Gonzalo Puertas discuss a case that concerns an application for judicial review seeking to challenge a decision to introduce a zero-duty autonomous tariff quota (“ATQ”) of 260,000 metric tonnes of raw cane sugar for refining.
Icons House

Adjudication 101: Introduction and Overview

Michael Comba traces the origins of adjudication and considers why the process was introduced, who it is aimed towards and how construction contracts must include certain provisions.
Icons Date

New Government Guidance on PFI Expiry

Rob Hann, Head of Local Government at Sharpe Pritchard, takes a look at new guidance on PFI expiry recently published by the IPA to help public bodies wrestle with the complexities of transition they will face as these contracts reach full term.
Icons Hazard

Three new Levels to ‘level up’ Local Government in England?

Rob Hann, Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of local government, takes a look at the new proposals under the Government’s Levelling Up White Paper to facilitate devolution to remaining regions of local government in England which are currently without a Mayoral Combined Authority.
Icons Hazard

Will employers still be able to use the practice of ‘fire and rehire’ in 2022?

Christian Grierson and Julie Bann discuss a recent case in which the High Court has granted an injunction preventing Tesco from using the controversial employment practice of ‘fire and rehire’.
Icons Hazard

Progress on Climate Change action plans in Local Government

Stephen Cirell discusses the progress on climate change and renewable energy action plans within Local Government.
<a href=

Witches’ hats, sexist comments, and a £2 million pay-out

Julie Bann and Christian Grierson discuss a case in which a finance specialist has won over £2 million in compensation, after claims of sex discrimination and unequal pay.
Slide background