Local Government Lawyer Home Page


Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).

 

                                                                                                  

Slide background

Transparency in Procurement: Procurement Policy Note (“PPN”) 07/21

Icons CourtJulie Lau, Clare Mendelle and Beth Edwards outline the new regime for publishing procurement notices post-Brexit

On 24th June, the Government issued PPN 07/21 (the “PPN”) relating to the publication of notices on Contracts Finder. The PPN is accompanied by the newly published “Guidance on the transparency requirements for publishing on Contracts Finder” (the “Guidance”) which must be applied by contracting authorities with immediate effect.

Part 1: Guidance applicable to all In-Scope Organisations

Part 1 of the Guidance replaces that previously published under PPN 07/16 and applies to all contracting authorities who must publish public sector opportunities on Contracts Finder under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (“PCR 2015”), excluding those listed in section 6 of Part 1 of the Guidance.

The requirements, which mostly stem from the PCR 2015, include:

  • Advertising most above-threshold contract opportunities on both Find-a-Tender Service (“FTS”) and Contracts Finder.
  • Publishing below-threshold public sector opportunities and contract award notices on Contracts Finder where they are worth at least £10,000 net of VAT (central government authorities), or at least £25,000 net of VAT (sub-central authorities and NHS Trusts).
  • Publishing contract opportunities on Contracts Finder within 24 hours of being advertised elsewhere, e.g. on FTS or other platforms.
  • The provision of specified information relating to procurement opportunities and awarded contracts. Further detail of these minimum publication requirements can be found in section 5 of Part 1 of the Guidance.
  • Publishing contract award notices on Contracts Finder within “a reasonable time” (as required within the PCR 2015), defined by the Guidance as follows:
  • For central government authorities, 30 calendar days after the contract award date.
  • For sub-central authorities, 90 calendar days after the contract award date.
  • Part 2: Additional policy guidance for central government authorities
  • Part 2 replaces the previous guidance “Publication of Central Government Tenders and Contracts” and applies exclusively to central government authorities as defined in Schedule 1 PCR 2015, excluding NHS Trusts.

The requirements include:

  • Providing unrestricted, free, and direct access to the tender documentation at the opportunity stage.
  • Publishing contract documents in full within 30 calendar days of award.
  • Following the Transparency Principles from PPN 01/17 (the “Principles”) (which were also updated on 24th June) by being proactive and releasing information during the life of the contract.
  • Considering where information should be exempted from disclosure or redacted under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“FOIA 2000”) and using exemptions or redactions appropriately.
  • Resolving extenuating circumstances which prevent the Guidelines from being followed as soon as reasonably practicable.

The Guidance also contains a number of annexes which provide helpful information:

  • Annex One – a summary of the requirements to publish on Contracts Finder;
  • Annex Two – FAQs on central government contracts; and
  • Annex Three – a flowchart on calculating timescales.

What has changed?

Notable changes brought about by the Guidance include the following:

  • References to OJEU and TED have been replaced by references to FTS.
  • “Contract award” for these purposes is defined as the date on which the contract is signed by the last contracting party, with timescales to publish running from the day after this date.
  • “Central Government” has been redefined so it aligns with the definition in Schedule 1 of the PCR 2015.
  • Executive Agencies and bodies for which central government authorities are responsible which are not explicitly listed in Schedule 1 of the PCR 2015 may be required by their relevant departments to follow Part 2, and central government authorities should encourage arms-length bodies and non-departmental public bodies to adopt the Guidance on a voluntary basis.
  • For consistency, details of contracts awarded by central government authorities must be published within 30 calendar days, instead of 20 days following the end of the ten-day standstill period (where applicable).
  • Clarification that if a deadline for publication falls on a non-working day, parties have until the end of the next working day to publish the relevant information.

Commentary

The Cabinet Office states in the PPN that the purpose of issuing the Guidance is “to reflect changes following the end of the transition period and to provide further clarity to enable In-Scope Organisations to meet their transparency obligations.”

Transparency of procurement opportunities and visibility of awarded contracts are a key feature of the Green Paper “Transforming Public Procurement”. Meanwhile, the case of Good Law Project and Others v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care provides a recent example of contracting authorities continuing to fall foul of transparency requirements. Contracting authorities should therefore familiarise themselves with PPN 07/21, as it consolidates and clarifies existing rules, while also indicating the Government’s direction of travel in relation to transparency under the upcoming reformed procurement regime.

Julie Lau is a legal director, Clare Mendelle a professional support lawyer and Beth Edwards a paralegal at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.


For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act

FREE DOWNLOAD

LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive

BUY NOW

  More Articles

Icons Hazard

Unconscious Bias, Discrimination and a Warning to Public Sector Employers

Christian Grierson and Julie Bann discuss two employment tribunal judgements, which provide a stark warning to public sector employers about unconscious bias and discrimination.
<a href=

Levelling up – A new opportunity for further devolution in England?

Rob Hann explores the Government's 'levelling up' policy and looks at whether it is an opportunity for further devolution in England.
<a href=

Time limits for commencing proceedings in procurement challenges

Colin Ricciardiello discusses a landmark procurement challenge judgment on the time limit for commencing proceedings.
Icons Hazard

The Revised National Planning Policy Framework: Better design, greener outcomes?

Alastair Lewis and Sarah Wertheim outline the latest National Planning Policy Framework changes and explain how future developments will be impacted by the new rules.
<a href=

Loose talk costs money: Oral agreement to forego liquidated damages was valid

Michael Comba outlines and analyses a contract dispute resolution: Mansion Place Ltd v Fox Industrial Services Ltd [2021] EWHC 2972 (TCC)
<a href=

Procurement reform – an update

Radhika Devesher and Natasha Barlow provide a summary of the proposed and enacted changes to the UK procurement regime post-Brexit.
Icons Court

The Public Procurement Review Service Report: Procurement Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Juli Lau and Beth Edwards examine some of the most common procurement pitfalls and provide a checklist of points for local authorities to bear in mind in order to avoid costly errors.
<a href=

JCT Dispute Adjudication Board Rules: a case of “three’s a crowd”?

Peter Jansen who specialises in construction law and dispute resolution, examines the roles and functions of the JCT’s Dispute Adjudication Board and highlights some key considerations for parties planning to adopt the Rules in their JCT contracts.
<a href=

The Electric Vehicle Revolution or…

Emily Knowles discusses new legislation on the requirement of electric vehicle charging points, and its potential impact on the Electric Vehicle Revolution.
<a href=

Consultation on the Electronic Communications Code – What’s Changing?

Lillee Reid-Hunt outlines the legislative changes to the Electronic Communications Code.
Icons Court

You Must Adjudicate First NEC3 imposes obligation to adjudicate first before commencing court proceedings.

Michael Comba discusses NEC3 imposing an obligation to adjudicate first before commencing court proceedings.
Icons Court

Rocking aground the Christmas tree

Clare Mendelle and George Dale discuss and solve a common construction scenario, looking at the position under the Contract, and how the Employer should deal with the Contractor's request.
Icons Hazard

Adequacy Decision Granted to the UK

Charlotte Smith considers two recent adequacy decisions and explains how this affects existing data practices.
<a href=

Managing employees with long COVID and employees who have anxiety about returning to the office

Julie Bann and Victoria Smith consider how Long Covid may be treated under existing employment laws and provide compliance guidance for employers.
<a href=

Environment Act 2021: What Does it Mean for Waste Authorities?

Sally Stock, Juli Lau, Ellen Painter and Beth Edwards discuss notable changes made to the Environment Bill 2021-2022, which received Royal Assent on the 9th November.
<a href=

ESG and its relevance to the public sector

Peter Collins and Sydney Chandler discuss the growing importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria in public procurement.
<a href=

JCT 101: Time and Punishment

Rachel Murray-Smith, Clare Mendelle and Laura Campbell discuss a common Construction scenario regarding the Practical Completion of a project, and the position under the unamended JCT DB 2016.
Icons Court

The importance of due process, communication and fairness in employee conduct investigations – what you need to know.

Julie Bann and James Hughes discuss the importance of fairness in employee conduct investigations, taking a look at the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham -v- Mr S Keable case.
<a href=

Becoming More Inclusive: VAT and Public Procurement

Juli Lau, Natasha Barlow and Beth Edwards examine the recently published Public Procurement Regulations 2021, focussing upon amendments to the thresholds within various procurement regimes.
<a href=

The LADs are Alright

Laura Campbell discusses liquidated damages in construction contracts, focussing upon the long-running Triple Point saga which ended in the Supreme Court this year.
<a href=

Procurement Policy Note 08/21

Juli Lau and Beth Edwards outline Procurement Policy Note 08/21, recently published by the Cabinet office.
Icons Court

Hard Times: Improving Air Quality with Clean Air Zones

Rob Hann and James Goldthorpe examine the introduction of Clean Air Zones to improve air quality across the UK.
<a href=

Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021 – What Public Bodies Need To Know

Rob Hann and James Hughes examine the Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021, looking at what Public Bodies need to know.
<a href=

Net Zero – What’s new for local authorities?

Steve Gummer and Sophie Drysdale look at two major climate publications: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and the Net Zero Strategy.
Icons Hazard

Jumping to conclusions: Final Statements, liquidated damages and material breaches of natural justice

Michael Comba looks at a recent Technology and Construction Court case that provides useful guidance on the JCT’s procedural requirements on disputing Final Statements.
Icons Court

Three times one equals one: Several disputed payment applications amount to a single dispute

Michael Comba considers a case in which the High Court dismissed an employer’s argument that an adjudicator lacked jurisdiction because the referral concerned three separate payment applications and, therefore, comprised three separate disputes.
<a href=

Warm feelings or hot air: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and Heat Networks

This week the government published its Heat and Buildings Strategy (Strategy). This contained vital innovations and essential step changes in terms of how heating is provided, writes Steve Gummer.
<a href=

Procurement reforms: update from Cabinet Office

Rob Hann, Nicola Sumner and Juli Lau assess the Cabinet Office's update on the progress of the government's public procurement reforms.
Icons Court

Bond, Performance Bond. Delivering value for the Public Sector?

Justin Mendelle examines whether public sector clients achieve value for money from the provision of performance bonds.
Icons Hazard

Not so personal messages: R. (on the application of Good Law Project Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and Abingdon Health Plc [2021] EWHC 2595 (TCC)

Nicola Sumner, Juli Lau and Beth Edwards look at The Good Law Project's challenge of the direct award by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care of three contracts for the production and supply of rapid Covid-19 antibody tests (the “Contracts”).
<a href=

Insolvency – Termination and Beyond

Rachel Murray-Smith and Clare Mendelle consider the potential warning signs of, and the compliant manner for dealing with, contractor insolvency.
Icons Court

Settlement agreements – waiving Personal Injury claims

In the case of Farnham-Oliver v RM Educational Resources LTD, the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court allowed a Personal Injury claim (“PI claim”) to be pursued by an employee against his former employer despite the parties signing a Settlement Agreement in respect of an Employment Tribunal claim on the same issue. Julie Bann and James Hughes report.
Icons Hazard

Mandatory Vaccination for Care Home Workers in England – Update

Rachel Murray-Smith and Francesca Gallagher look at the detail of the government's guidance on compulsory vaccination for care staff.
<a href=

Make your mind up! Liquidated Damages clause upheld despite Employer’s challenge

In the recent case of Eco World Ballymore (EWB) v Dobler[1] , an Employer took the unusual position of challenging their own entitlement to liquidated damages (LDs) on the ground that the LDs provision constituted an unenforceable penalty clause. Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe investigate.
<a href=

Are Collateral Warranties Construction Contracts? Timing is Key.

Clare Mendelle and Anna Sidebottom examine the recently decided case of Toppan v Simply[1], which has provided guidance on when collateral warranties may be considered “construction contracts” under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 and so give the warranty holder the right to adjudicate.
Slide background