Local Government Lawyer Home Page

Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).



Slide background

Transparency in Procurement: Procurement Policy Note (“PPN”) 07/21

Icons CourtJulie Lau, Clare Mendelle and Beth Edwards outline the new regime for publishing procurement notices post-Brexit

On 24th June, the Government issued PPN 07/21 (the “PPN”) relating to the publication of notices on Contracts Finder. The PPN is accompanied by the newly published “Guidance on the transparency requirements for publishing on Contracts Finder” (the “Guidance”) which must be applied by contracting authorities with immediate effect.

Part 1: Guidance applicable to all In-Scope Organisations

Part 1 of the Guidance replaces that previously published under PPN 07/16 and applies to all contracting authorities who must publish public sector opportunities on Contracts Finder under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (“PCR 2015”), excluding those listed in section 6 of Part 1 of the Guidance.

The requirements, which mostly stem from the PCR 2015, include:

  • Advertising most above-threshold contract opportunities on both Find-a-Tender Service (“FTS”) and Contracts Finder.
  • Publishing below-threshold public sector opportunities and contract award notices on Contracts Finder where they are worth at least £10,000 net of VAT (central government authorities), or at least £25,000 net of VAT (sub-central authorities and NHS Trusts).
  • Publishing contract opportunities on Contracts Finder within 24 hours of being advertised elsewhere, e.g. on FTS or other platforms.
  • The provision of specified information relating to procurement opportunities and awarded contracts. Further detail of these minimum publication requirements can be found in section 5 of Part 1 of the Guidance.
  • Publishing contract award notices on Contracts Finder within “a reasonable time” (as required within the PCR 2015), defined by the Guidance as follows:
  • For central government authorities, 30 calendar days after the contract award date.
  • For sub-central authorities, 90 calendar days after the contract award date.
  • Part 2: Additional policy guidance for central government authorities
  • Part 2 replaces the previous guidance “Publication of Central Government Tenders and Contracts” and applies exclusively to central government authorities as defined in Schedule 1 PCR 2015, excluding NHS Trusts.

The requirements include:

  • Providing unrestricted, free, and direct access to the tender documentation at the opportunity stage.
  • Publishing contract documents in full within 30 calendar days of award.
  • Following the Transparency Principles from PPN 01/17 (the “Principles”) (which were also updated on 24th June) by being proactive and releasing information during the life of the contract.
  • Considering where information should be exempted from disclosure or redacted under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“FOIA 2000”) and using exemptions or redactions appropriately.
  • Resolving extenuating circumstances which prevent the Guidelines from being followed as soon as reasonably practicable.

The Guidance also contains a number of annexes which provide helpful information:

  • Annex One – a summary of the requirements to publish on Contracts Finder;
  • Annex Two – FAQs on central government contracts; and
  • Annex Three – a flowchart on calculating timescales.

What has changed?

Notable changes brought about by the Guidance include the following:

  • References to OJEU and TED have been replaced by references to FTS.
  • “Contract award” for these purposes is defined as the date on which the contract is signed by the last contracting party, with timescales to publish running from the day after this date.
  • “Central Government” has been redefined so it aligns with the definition in Schedule 1 of the PCR 2015.
  • Executive Agencies and bodies for which central government authorities are responsible which are not explicitly listed in Schedule 1 of the PCR 2015 may be required by their relevant departments to follow Part 2, and central government authorities should encourage arms-length bodies and non-departmental public bodies to adopt the Guidance on a voluntary basis.
  • For consistency, details of contracts awarded by central government authorities must be published within 30 calendar days, instead of 20 days following the end of the ten-day standstill period (where applicable).
  • Clarification that if a deadline for publication falls on a non-working day, parties have until the end of the next working day to publish the relevant information.


The Cabinet Office states in the PPN that the purpose of issuing the Guidance is “to reflect changes following the end of the transition period and to provide further clarity to enable In-Scope Organisations to meet their transparency obligations.”

Transparency of procurement opportunities and visibility of awarded contracts are a key feature of the Green Paper “Transforming Public Procurement”. Meanwhile, the case of Good Law Project and Others v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care provides a recent example of contracting authorities continuing to fall foul of transparency requirements. Contracting authorities should therefore familiarise themselves with PPN 07/21, as it consolidates and clarifies existing rules, while also indicating the Government’s direction of travel in relation to transparency under the upcoming reformed procurement regime.

Julie Lau is a legal director, Clare Mendelle a professional support lawyer and Beth Edwards a paralegal at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.

For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act


LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive


  More Articles

<a href=

Make your mind up! Liquidated Damages clause upheld despite Employer’s challenge

In the recent case of Eco World Ballymore (EWB) v Dobler[1] , an Employer took the unusual position of challenging their own entitlement to liquidated damages (LDs) on the ground that the LDs provision constituted an unenforceable penalty clause. Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe investigate.
<a href=

Are Collateral Warranties Construction Contracts? Timing is Key.

Clare Mendelle and Anna Sidebottom examine the recently decided case of Toppan v Simply[1], which has provided guidance on when collateral warranties may be considered “construction contracts” under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 and so give the warranty holder the right to adjudicate.
Icons Court

Climate emergency or climate catastrophe?

Rob Hann asks how central & local government departments and councils can work together more effectively to combat the challenges to achieve net zero by 2050.
Icons Court

Big Problems Need Radical Solutions – Time to Play Monopoly with District Heating?

Steve Gummer examines how local authorities might make district heat networks a reality.
<a href=

The Judicial Review and Courts Bill

The Judicial Review and Courts Bill was introduced to the House last week on 21 July 2021. William Rose and Anna Sidebottom discuss the potential impact of the bill.
<a href=

Liquidated damages and termination

Clare Mendelle, Francesca Gallagher and James Goldthorpe provide an outline of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Triple Point Technology vs PTT Public Company Limited.

Mandatory Vaccination for Care Home Workers in England

The Government has announced that people working in care homes in England must be fully vaccinated against Covid-19 from October 2021, unless they have a medical exemption, write Rachel Murray-Smith and Francesca Gallagher.
Icons Court

When procurement law and contracts for interests in land meet

Colin Ricciardiello provides a case law update examining cases that have examined the overlap between a requirement to procure and a contract for the disposal of an interest in land.
tb w74 h74 crop int a734a5aec8e0dcb7849ee8ebeb84a53d

UK granted data protection adequacy decision

Charlotte Smith summarises the new data protection adequacy decision.

First Impressions on the New Subsidy Control Bill

Last week the Government published its new Subsidy Control Bill. The Bill represents a significant shift in the way in which subsidies are assessed and also provides some clarity about the regime that will replace the EU State aid regime, writes Peter Collins.
Icons Court

Managing new enforcement powers for councils under the Traffic management Act 2004

Rob Hann considers the recent legislative changes to traffic management in England, including the introduction of Clean Air Zones and widening local authorities enforcement powers for moving traffic offences.
Icons Court

Implementing Net Zero: Taking account of Carbon Reduction Plans in the Procurement of Major Government Contracts

The Government recently published the Procurement Policy Note 06/21. This will require suppliers bidding for major government contracts to provide a Carbon Reduction Plan at the selection stage and commit to achieving Net Zero by 2050, writes Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe.
tb w74 h74 crop int a734a5aec8e0dcb7849ee8ebeb84a53d

Public Procurement Update June 2021

On 3 June 2021, the Government issued the National Procurement Policy Statement (NPPS), and the associated Procurement Policy Note (PPN). George Dale explains what each document does.

What a bind: Section 106 planning obligations where there are multiple land interests

Rachel Lee and Christos Paphiti consider whether the case of R (on the application of McLaren) v Woking Borough Council impacts upon local planning authorities (LPAs) ability to properly consider the land interests and parties as regards to performance of specific obligations.
Icons Court

The use of experts only works when everyone plays by the same rules

Colin Ricciardiello looks at the use of expert witnesses in the wake of an important recent decision.
Icons Court

Unlawful Award of Contract

The High Court has ruled that the Minister for the Cabinet Office, Michael Gove, broke the law by giving a contract to a market research company, Public First, who are run by long-time associates of his. Anna Sidebottom, Francesca Gallagher and Clare Mendelle report.
Icons Date

Time after time: extending time for determination of a prior approval application

Rachel Lee and Christos Paphiti examine the time period for determination of Prior Approval (‘PA’) applications and explore how a local authority can extend the time period for determination.
Icons Date

The Cram Slam – Part 26A Restructuring Plans and Commercial Leases

David Nelson looks at the impact on landlords of a controversial High Court decision to allow a restructuring plan for a chain of health clubs.
Icons Court

The limits of an adjudicator's jurisdiction

Dr Paul Hughes and Anna Sidebottom look at the effect of Prater v Sisk [2021] on the ability of an Adjudicator to rely on previous 'out of jurisdiction' decisions between the same parties
Icons House

The Queen’s Speech and Judicial Review

Colin Ricciardiello looks at the likely effects of the government's proposed changes to the judicial review process.
Icons House

The Subsidy Control Bill

Ryan Copeland and James Hughes analyse the main provisions of the Subsidy Control Bill announced in the recent Queen’s speech.
Icons Court

Councils unable to hold meetings remotely from 7th May

Radhika Devesher considers the fallout from the High Court's decision that online council meetings cannot continue past 7th May and outlines the practical steps that councils can take to ensure that the decision-making process is not adversely affected.
Icons Court

You can’t claim that! Court finds exclusion clauses work just like any other clause

The recent case of Mott MacDonald Limited v Trant Engineering Limited serves as a timely reminder that exclusion clauses in construction contracts can and do work and will be enforced by the courts to prevent what may otherwise be valid claims write Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe.
Icons Date

Sparks Flying: Increasing Network Connectivity For Tenants

Lillee Reid-Hunt, James Nelson and Natasha Barlow look at the potential impact of The Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Act 2021 on reducing delays in the installation of telecommunications equipment to leasehold properties.
Icons House

Subcontract held to govern works commenced before execution

Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe examine a case which considered which terms governed liability for works carried out prior to the execution of a contract.
Icons Court

No overlap between substance and jurisdictional issues

Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe examine the implications of Ex Novo Limited v MPS Housing Limited [2020] EWHC 3804 (TCC)]
Icons Court

Home is where the heart is

Bernadette Hillman and Christos Paphiti outline the new permitted development right and what it means for the property sector and planners
Icons Date

Can a worker get paid for sleeping?

Some jobs such as care workers, security guards and nightwatchmen require the individual to work night shifts where they may, with the approval of their employer, sleep during some or all of the shift, but nevertheless remain on standby during that time.
Icons Date

Can you decline to sponsor skilled workers under the new immigration rules?

Is there an obligation to consider resident workforce prior to employing migrants? Julie Bann and Aleksandra Wolek report.
Icons House

The Long Goodbye to the PFI

Rob Hann, Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government takes a look at the House of Common’s Public Account Committees’ recent report into the pending expiry of PFI contracts which contains some interesting recommendations….
Icons Court

Changes to the Electronic Communications Code

The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport has commenced a consultation on changes to the Electronic Communications Code 2017 (the “Code”). James Nelson, Lillee Reid-Hunt and Natasha Barlow report.
Icons Court

The Heat Networks (Scotland) Bill

Until last week the heat network sector in Scotland was not specifically regulated. The recent Heat Networks (Scotland) Bill seeks to rectify this by creating a regulatory framework and licencing system designed to encourage the increased use of heat networks.
Icons Date

A step in the right direction

Rob Hann and Juli Lau outline Sharpe Pritchard’s response to the Government’s Green Paper on reforming the ‘outdated’ public procurement regime.
Rob Hann

Life on the Edge!

This week sees the launch of Sharpe Edge – the home of Sharpe Pritchard on Local Government Lawyer. We have created Sharpe Edge for local authorities who are looking for ways to help their communities rebuild and regenerate following the devasting impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic.
Icons Court

Teckal and Beyond….

In this article Rob Hann, Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, takes a look at what isn’t covered in the recent Green Paper on Transforming the UK’s Public Procurement rules, namely the exception contained in regulation 12 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015), commonly referred to as the Teckal exemption and asks whether Teckal is ‘fit for purpose’ in a post Brexit, post pandemic environment?
Icons Court

Jurisdiction Clauses & Enforcing Adjudication Decisions

The case of Motacus Constructions Ltd v Paolo Castelli Spa [2021] EWHC 356 (TCC) confirms adjudication’s status as an interim-binding measure and reinforces its importance as a dispute resolution forum in the construction industry.
Slide background