- Details
Government issues response to the UK ETS expansion to waste
Natasha Barlow provides insight into the Government's response to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme consultation.![]()
The government has this week issued a long-awaited interim response to the consultation relating to the expansion of the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) to the waste sector. The intention is that energy from waste (EfW) and waste incineration facilities will enter the UK ETS fully from 2028, when operators will be obliged to acquire and surrender carbon allowances for their fossil-derived CO2 emissions.
The key takeaway from the government’s interim response is that a voluntary MRV (monitoring, reporting and verification) period will commence from January 2026. In scope are combustion and process emissions from EfW and waste incineration processes, including advanced thermal treatments and advanced conversion technologies. During this period, operators will not be required to obtain carbon allowances, nor will there be any penalties for failure to participate.
The threshold for inclusion is based on the small waste incinerator plant throughput, meaning that facilities processing three tonnes an hour or more of non-hazardous waste, or 10 tonnes a day or more of hazardous waste, can participate in the MRV period. Clinical waste incinerators, HSE (Hospital and Small Emitter) and USE (Ultra-Small Emitter) are all in scope.
High temperature incinerators that deal primarily with hazardous waste are, however, out of scope. This is in response to respondents’ concerns that there are no alternatives to the incineration of certain hazardous waste types, including POPs, and therefore it is not possible to decarbonise. Further, there were concerns that the inclusion of hazardous waste would encourage export, particularly given the EU ETS exemptions.
Responses to the consultation showed concern across local authorities and the waste industry about landfill or export of waste becoming a cheaper option. While the majority of respondents did not support the extension of UK ETS to landfill, there was acknowledgement that measures (e.g. increasing landfill tax) need to be taken to stop this becoming a more cost-efficient option.
As expected, the responses to the consultation illustrate local authorities’ concerns that the cost of UK ETS will be directly passed through. There is a general recognition in the government’s response of the financial burden on local authorities, and further assurances that packaging extended producer responsibility (pEPR) will help to mitigate the cost of incinerating packaging materials. However, the response falls short of confirming any measures or funding to support local authorities to manage the significant cost impact of UK ETS.
In order to monitor emissions, the government intends to use an integrated method using analysis of carbon-14 and emissions factors, and we are informed that the government will issue guidance by the end of 2025 about how to participate in the MRV period. The detailed methodology of how emissions will be measured for the purposes of allowances is not yet clear, however, and local authorities will no doubt remain concerned about the practicalities of installing any measurement equipment and related budgeting.
Given the remaining uncertainty, we would encourage local authorities and EfW operators to take the following steps:
- Participate in the voluntary MRV period to help understand your emissions and future exposure to UK ETS. Data will also help to drive the development of further policy.
- Review and, where necessary, amend waste management contracts to address forthcoming carbon costs.
- Budget now for the anticipated costs of UK ETS from 2028, and explore measures to reduce fossil carbon content in waste streams.
Natasha Barlow is an Associate at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.
For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.
This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email
|
Click here to view our archived articles or search below.
|
|
ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD
We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector. Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms. All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here.
|
|
OUR RECENT ARTICLES
March 09, 2026
Anti-Money Laundering: Key Issues for Local Government Legal and Governance TeamsMoney laundering risk is often seen as a problem for banks, lawyers and accountants. But local authorities are far from immune. In a recent webinar hosted by Sharpe Pritchard, Corporate Partner Pete Collins explored how anti-money laundering (AML) laws apply to local…
March 09, 2026
Arts and Culture, Community and Regeneration: The Two New Streamlined Subsidy RoutesBeatrice Wood and Sophie Read explore the two new Streamlined Routes, officially introduced in February this year, to simplify the awards of certain subsidies: the Community and Regeneration route and the Arts and Culture route. This article discusses the potential impact of…
March 05, 2026
Reserve below-threshold contracts for UK or local suppliers under the 2026 OrderJuli Lau and Shyann Sheehy look into the impact of the Local Government (Exclusion of Non-commercial Considerations) (England) Order 2026, and particularly how local authorities can now reserve below-threshold contracts for UK or local suppliers.
March 05, 2026
CMO Principle and Financial Assistance Further Clarified in Latest CAT Judgment on Subsidy ControlBeatrice Wood and Oliver Dickie explore the key implications for public authorities following the latest CAT judgment on subsidy control (The Subsidy Control Act 2022: The New Lottery Company Ltd and Others v The Gambling Commission).
|
|
OUR KEY LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONTACTS
|
||
|
Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
Rachel Murray-Smith Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |










Catherine Newman
