Local Government Lawyer Home Page


Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).

 

                                                                                                  

Slide background

Signet Trading Limited v First Property Group – First Award under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 Scheme

Icons DocumentJoe Walker and James Nelson outline and analyse the first award under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 Scheme.

There has been much anticipation in recent months for the decisions under the new arbitration scheme contained in the recently introduced Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 (the “Act”).

In the last week, we have seen the publication of the very first arbitration award under the Act: Signet Trading Limited v Fprop Offices (Nominee) 4 Limited (1) and Fprop Offices (Nominee) 5 Limited (2). The Arbitrator was Gary Cowen QC.

The Act

The Act came into force on 24 March 2022 with the purpose of resolving disputes relating to specific rent debts under business tenancies adversely affected by the Covid-19 Pandemic via an arbitration process.

The key criteria for the Act to apply are that there is:

  1. A “Business tenancy” – meaning a tenancy to which Part 2 of Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 applies (s.2(5) of the Act); and
  2. A “Protected rent debt” – which, for the purposes of the Act, means a debt under a business tenancy consisting of unpaid protected rent (s.3(1) of the Act).

The rent is only protected if the tenancy was “adversely affected by coronavirus” – i.e. where (a) the whole or part of the business carried on by the tenant was at or from the premises comprised in the tenancy, or (b) the whole or part of those premises, was subject to a closure requirement pursuant to the various coronavirus regulations introduced during the lockdowns (s.3(2) and s.4 of the Act).

Further, the rent must be attributable to a period of occupation by the tenant within the “protected period”. This being the period commencing on 21 March 2020 (the date on which lockdown measures were first initiated) and ending on 18 July 2021 in England and 7 August 2021 in Wales (s.3(2) and s.5 of the Act).

Where the provisions of the Act apply, either the landlord or the tenant may refer the dispute to arbitration within the period of 6 months commencing on the date on which the Act was enacted. The referral period will end on 24 September 2022 – little over two months away.

On referral, an arbitrator may determine the amount of protected rent debt (awarding full, partial or even zero payment to the landlord) and/or whether the tenant is entitled to any relief in connection with the payment of the protected rent debt. Such relief could, for example, take the form of a waiver of interest payments due or granting a tenant a longer period for payment to 24 months (s.13-14 of the Act).

The case – background

Signet Trading Limited (the “Tenant”) was the tenant of premises at Building 3, Imperial Place, Elstree Way, Borehamwood, Hertfordshire WD6 1JN (the Premises”). The landlord was Fprop Offices (Nominee) 4 Limited and Fprop Offices (Nominee) 5 Limited (the “Landlord”).

The Tenant, along with its well-known subsidiary companies H Samuel Limited and Ernest Jones Limited, occupied hundreds of retail stores in the UK selling jewellery and watches, with associated services.

However, the Premises in question did not comprise a retail shop. The Premises were offices (specifically, its registered office) and used by its board of directors and employees.

On 23 March 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Tenant made the decision to close all of its retail shops. Staff working at the Premises were instructed to work from home and/or were furloughed. Only two of the employees continued to attend the offices – one to scan in post and one was a security guard.

In the arbitration referral, the Tenant sought relief from payment of an alleged protected rent debt constituting unpaid rent arrears totalling £448,043.04 together with contractual interest which was due to the Landlord under the relevant lease of the Premises.

The case – decision

The key question was whether a closure requirement applied to the business carried on by the Tenant at the Premises. As discussed above, this requirement is a prerequisite of a “protected rent debt” for the purposes of s.3 of the Act.

The Arbitrator ultimately determined that there was no closure requirement, the Tenant’s business at the Premises was therefore not adversely affected by coronavirus for the purposes of s.4 of the 2022 Act, and the reference should be dismissed. This meant that no relief was applied to the Tenant’s obligation to pay the unpaid rent arrears and interest under the Lease.

The principal case advanced by the Tenant was that it was subject to a closure requirement by virtue of the Health Protection (Coronavirus Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020 (the “Coronavirus Regulations”) which came into force on 26 March 2020. Paragraph 5(1) of the Coronavirus Regulations states that a person responsible for carrying on a business which is not listed in Part 3 of Schedule 2 of the Coronavirus Regulations (i.e. offering goods for sale in a shop) must cease to carry on that business.

The Tenant’s business was not one which fell within Part 3 of Schedule 2. The issue, then, was whether the Tenant was carrying on a business of offering goods for sale in a shop from the Premises.

The Arbitrator found that it was plain that it was not: the Premises was an office, not a shop.

Whilst the Tenant sought to argue that the business actually being carried on at the Premises was, in essence, an ancillary part of the same business with the office use merely supporting the Tenant’s retail business, the Arbitrator found that Regulation 5(1) of the Coronavirus Regulations was not intended to and does not extend to such a situation.

Joe Walker is a Senior Associate and James Nelson is a Solicitor at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.

How can we assist?

Sharpe Pritchard’s property litigation and real estate teams offers advice and guidance to landlords and tenants across the full spectrum of property issues. If you would like to discuss your options in connection with any outstanding rent debts arising during the COVID-19 pandemic or otherwise, please contact Joe Walker (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.) or James Nelson (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.) or on 0207 405 4600 for a free initial consultation.

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. Law and guidance relating to the COVID19 pandemic is continually being updated and the law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issues raised, please contact us today by telephone or email.


For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act

FREE DOWNLOAD

LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive

BUY NOW

  More Articles

Icons Hazard

Holiday entitlement and pay for atypical working arrangements: Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] UKSC 21

Julie Bann and David Leach analyse a landmark Supreme Court ruling on holiday entitlement and pay for atypical working arrangements.
Icons House

UK Emission Trading Scheme to include waste incineration installations

Steve Gummer and Gonzalo Puertas take a look at the UK Emission Trading Scheme and new decisions on waste incineration.
Icons Deal

Procurement reforms – implications for procurement challenges and remedies

Colin Ricciardello considers the implications for procurement challenges and remedies arising out of the Government's procurement reforms.
Icons House

Relationship between limitation act and scheme for construction contracts

David Owens and Natasha Barlow look at the implications of Hirst & Another v Dunbar & Others [2022] EWHC 41 (TCC)
Icons House

An Introduction to the Building Safety Act 2022

The Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) received Royal Assent in April 2022. Deborah Down outlines the main provisions.
Icons Date

Tackling Teckal – does the new Procurement Bill adequately deal with the Teckal exemption?

Peter Collins and Sophie Pilcher take a look at whether the new Procurement Bill adequately deals with the Teckal exemption
Icons Hazard

Local authorities on track to more freedom to cut ties with Russian and Belarusian suppliers

Juli Lau and Gonzalo Puertas discuss the increased freedom for Local Authorities to cut ties with Russian and Belarusian suppliers.
Icons Hazard

Nitrogen Credits Commentary

Emily Knowles, Bernadette Hillman and Steve Gummer discuss the impact of nitrate on planning permission and development in the UK.
Icons House

Thurrock Council & Another v Adams & Ors [2022] EWHC 1324 (QB)

William Rose, Partner at Sharpe Pritchard LLP, has successfully acted for Thurrock Council and Essex County Council in obtaining a ‘first of its kind’ injunction against individuals connected with the protest group Just Stop Oil.
Icons Date

The Adjudication Part 3: The Response and Further Submissions 9 June 2022

David Owens and James Goldthorpe look at the responding party's response and further submissions during adjudication.
Icons House

A renewable future: focusing energy solutions at a local level

Natasha Barlow and Steve Gummer discuss the 'Energy Trilemma' and how it is playing out at a local level.
Icons Date

Procurement Bill – Initial impressions from the first draft

Juli Lau and Sophie Mcfie-Hyland outline their initial impressions from the first draft of the Procurement Bill.
Icons Hazard

Let’s paint the town green! Government plans for green homes

Laura Campbell discusses the change urgently needed in towns and cities to make the landscape greener.
Icons House

The Queen’s Speech in Brief

The number of Bills which affect public sector clients is greater than usual – and the government have got straight off the starting blocks by publishing some of them already.
Icons Hazard

Refurbishment and Retrofitting: In with the old, out with the new!

Sharpe Pritchard analyse the challenge of decarbonising the construction sector.
Icons House

NET ZERO – What obligations are there on the UK to achieve it?

Radhika Devesher takes a look at the legal duty to achieve net-zero placed upon the UK.
Icons House

Championing green goals through public buying

Juli Lau considers how public purchasing power can be used to champion Net Zero goals, and how public procurement might be used as another driver for change.
Icons Hazard

Top Tips for Local Authority Lawyers advising on Data Protection Matters

Charlotte Smith and Hannah Peto set out some of their top tips to consider when advising on data protection matters.
Icons Court

The Cost of Freedom of Information – The Council’s Failure to Advise

Charlotte Smith and Nadia Ahmed summarise the case and judgement of Moss v Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames and another (NJ/2018/007).
Icons QA

Ask the team

These are frequently asked questions to our experts from colleagues in Local Government via the Sharpe Pritchard ask the team facility concerning local authority companies, partnerships, charging and trading.
Icons Court

A call to review public contracts with Russian suppliers

Juli Lau and Gonzalo Puertas discuss the first official document to consider public sector contracts with companies linked to the Russian and Belarusian state regimes, issued by the Cabinet Office.
Icons Date

A New NEC Option to tackle greenwashing in the construction industry

Allan Owen and Sophie Drysdale discuss 'greenwashing' in the construction industry and a new secondary option clause X29 for its NEC4 suite of contracts developed by NEC.
Icons House

The Pathway to the Future – The Road Map for Employment Tribunals

David Leach discusses and outlines the road map of the planned changes for modernising the Tribunals in 2022 and 2023 released by The Presidents of the Employment Tribunals.
Icons House

Farrar Out

Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe discuss how the insolvency of Farrar Construction leads to clarity from the Courts on dealing with an insolvent contractor under JCT.
Icons House

The UK government has this week introduced the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill

Peter Collins and Sophie Pilcher discuss the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill introduced by the UK Government this week.
Icons Hazard

A sweet truth for selectivity

Steve Gummer and Gonzalo Puertas discuss a case that concerns an application for judicial review seeking to challenge a decision to introduce a zero-duty autonomous tariff quota (“ATQ”) of 260,000 metric tonnes of raw cane sugar for refining.
Icons House

Adjudication 101: Introduction and Overview

Michael Comba traces the origins of adjudication and considers why the process was introduced, who it is aimed towards and how construction contracts must include certain provisions.
Icons Date

New Government Guidance on PFI Expiry

Rob Hann, Head of Local Government at Sharpe Pritchard, takes a look at new guidance on PFI expiry recently published by the IPA to help public bodies wrestle with the complexities of transition they will face as these contracts reach full term.
Icons Hazard

Three new Levels to ‘level up’ Local Government in England?

Rob Hann, Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of local government, takes a look at the new proposals under the Government’s Levelling Up White Paper to facilitate devolution to remaining regions of local government in England which are currently without a Mayoral Combined Authority.
Icons Hazard

Will employers still be able to use the practice of ‘fire and rehire’ in 2022?

Christian Grierson and Julie Bann discuss a recent case in which the High Court has granted an injunction preventing Tesco from using the controversial employment practice of ‘fire and rehire’.
Icons Hazard

Progress on Climate Change action plans in Local Government

Stephen Cirell discusses the progress on climate change and renewable energy action plans within Local Government.
Slide background