Local Government Lawyer Home Page


Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).

 

                                                                                                  

Slide background

The Government’s response to the Transforming Public Procurement consultation: what will change and what will not?

Juli Lau, Colin Ricciardiello, Beth Edwards and Natasha Barlow analyse the Government’s response to the Transforming Public Procurement consultation.

<a href=

On 6th December 2021, nearly a year after the Green Paper on public procurement reforms was published, Cabinet Office released its response (the ‘Response’) to the 619 consultation responses it received. Having submitted a detailed response in March, our article earlier this year summarised the key reform proposals and below, members of the Sharpe Pritchard Procurement Working Group outline the development of proposals that Government intends to proceed with, as well as those it has chosen not to pursue.

Chapter 1: Procurement that better meets the UK’s needs

Government intends to press on with a new set of procurement principles to replace the previous EU principles, but these will be divided into ‘principles’ and ‘statutory objectives’. The principles will be transparency, fair treatment of suppliers and non-discrimination, while the statutory objectives will be promoting the importance of fair and open competition, maximising public benefit, value for money and integrity. At this stage, the Response does not expand on how the principles and statutory objectives are to be applied differently in practice.

The Response amends proposals for a unit to oversee public procurement. The new Procurement Review Unit will sit within Cabinet Office and will focus on investigating systemic or institutional breaches of the procurement regulations, and making recommendations for future compliance. It will not have power to intervene in any specific procurement decisions.

Chapter 2: A simpler regulatory framework

Government intends to go ahead with consolidating the various procurement regimes into a single framework, but in response to consultation responses, some flexibilities of the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016 (UCR) and Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011 (DSPCR) will be retained for those sectors.

Utilities will be bound by the new legislation in so far as they are carrying out prescribed relevant activities (which will be broadly as currently defined under the UCR). A number of exemptions currently available to utilities will be retained, such as contracts awarded to affiliated undertakings, certain supply of water and energy contracts, the use of qualification systems, and the ability to make modifications without a financial cap.

While the Response does not explicitly refer to the eight years currently available to frameworks under the UCR, it does confirm that utilities will be allowed to award longer “closed” frameworks, to be consistent with their current flexibility and sector-specific regulatory needs.

The Response promises a full suite of national security exemptions for sensitive procurement. It also acknowledges that specific provisions will cover the definition, valuation and duration of concession contracts.

We had raised a number of these sector-specific issues in our response, and we look forward to seeing how these will be addressed in legislation.

Chapter 3: Using the right procurement procedures

A key element of the Green Paper was the replacement of the current procedures with three new ones: the flexible procedure, open procedure and limited tendering procedure. While acknowledging concerns about the complexity and potentially increased burdens for contracting authorities, Government intends to press on with this change.

The Green Paper’s proposal to add ‘crisis’ as a ground for using the limited tendering procedure is being retained as a concept, although the intention is to consider granting a new power to a Government Minister to ‘declare when action is necessary to protect life’, so that limited tendering rules apply.

The paper also proposed the removal of the Light Touch Regime for “social and other services”. Following responses concerned that this would lower the value threshold for key social service contracts, an amended version will now remain in place.

Chapter 4: Awarding the right contract to the right supplier

The majority of the changes proposed in Chapter 4 will be implemented, such as the proposal to amend Most Economically Advantageous Tender to Most Advantageous Tender. While retaining the basic requirement that award criteria should be linked to the subject matter of a contract, Government intends to use secondary legislation to require (or permit) contracting authorities to take into account policy priorities that may not be directly related to the contract subject matter.

Interestingly, Government is proposing to introduce a power to disapply s17 of the Local Government Act 1988 in certain circumstances – this is in response to concerns raised (including by this Firm) that local authorities are required to comply with obligations under such legislation which may not always align with proposals under the new procurement regime, e.g. criteria not linked to subject matter.

The centrally managed debarment list, and changes to the grounds for excluding suppliers from procurements, including the wider grounds on which poor past performance can be taken into account, are intended to be taken forward, with a new exclusion framework to provide clearer guidance on this issue.

Chapter 5 – Using the best commercial purchasing tools

The Response confirms that proposed reforms to the Dynamic Purchasing System will be introduced (albeit renamed “The Dynamic Market”), including making the system available for all types of procurements (rather than just common goods and services), and new suppliers being added at any point.

Government intends to proceed with creating “open frameworks” which can be established with a maximum term of eight years (and multiple joining points). Following consultation, however, the maximum period that an open framework can be kept closed to new joiners will be five years rather than the three originally proposed. This represents a relative increase to the current maximum four years for frameworks under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR), which would now apply to “closed frameworks” under the new regime, with exceptions for utilities.

Chapter 6 – Ensuring Open and Transparent Contracting

In response to concerns (mostly from contracting authorities) about the resource intensity of the proposals, as well as issues around commercial sensitivity, Government has made the following amendments to the Green Paper proposals in relation to the publication of procurement data to a central platform using the Open Data Contracting Standard:

  • There will be no requirement to disclose tenders submitted due to concerns this could prejudice future competitions.
  • Publication of contract documents will initially only be required for those valued above £2 million. These documents can be redacted to address confidentiality.
  • The publication of beneficial ownership details will not apply to all bidders, only successful bidders.
  • A reduction in the scope and extent of publication of evaluation documents. (See Chapter 7.)

Chapter 7:  Fair and Fast Challenges for procurement decisions

The Green Paper consulted on making procurement challenges quicker and more accessible by a variety of proposed measures.

The Response confirms that the following will not be introduced:

  • Independent review by the contracting authority;
  • Tribunal to deal with low value claims;
  • Primacy of pre-contract remedies over post-contractual damages; and
  • Cap on damages.

Some of the proposals in this Chapter are still under review:

  • Potential options to replace the American Cyanamid test (used when considering suspension-lifting applications under PCR Regulation 96(1)(a)) are still being considered, but it is envisaged that the new test would be a single limb test centring on the overriding consequences on the interests at stake. That may translate into who is prejudiced the most by lifting/ending the suspension, akin to the balance of convenience test under American Cyanamid.
  • The exploration of reforms to improve access and reduce timescales continues, alongside the Ministry of Justice and the Civil Procedure Rules Committee.

The two key proposals that will be implemented are:

  • The removal of the automatic suspension in crisis and extreme urgency, but with requirements to publish a contract award notice and subsequently contract details; and
  • The removal of mandated debrief letters.

The publication process for contract award decisions would instead be as follows:

  • Award Notice stating the intention to award, anticipated value, identity of all bidders and a standstill period;
  • Provision of some of the winning bidder’s redacted evaluation documents to all bidders;
  • Each bidder to receive its own unredacted evaluation documents to enable comparison against the winning bid; and
  • Voluntary individual debrief letters can additionally be provided.

Giving the documents at (ii) and (iii) above moves towards the codification of the Technology and Construction Court’s guidance on pre-action conduct to provide a challenger with the key decision material, which is in turn taken from the decision in Roche Diagnostics v. Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2013] EWHC 604(TCC).

This may be less of a step change for authorities who are already providing this level of evaluation information with standstill letters, but still places a burden on authorities to ensure compliance with both the publication and redaction requirements.

Chapter 8 – Effective Contract Management

Government has decided to introduce its proposals on contract management reform, with some changes to address concerns raised.

Suppliers deep in the supply chain will have more direct access to contracting authorities when supply chain payment issues occur, but must first evidence their attempts to resolve these issues.

There will be more flexibility to amend contracts in times of crisis, but with new provisions specifically targeting the amendment of complex contracts. The less stringent grounds currently available for changes under the UCR will also be maintained for utilities, and defence and security contracts will be afforded the maximum level of flexibility in recognition of Ministry of Defence requirements.

The new mandatory contract change notices will only need to be published for changes over specified thresholds, and the proposed cap on profits for contract extensions will not be introduced.

Next steps

The earliest that the new regime will come into force is 2023, with a six-month prior notice period, and it is expected that secondary legislation and supporting guidance will be published in similar time frames. Meanwhile, the Cabinet Office intends to deliver a detailed learning and development programme to assist with the transition.

Our Procurement Working Group is keeping a close eye on developments while we await the draft legislation, and through our knowledge-sharing networks we aim to provide regular briefings to clients, in readiness for changes which will affect contracting authorities and utilities, as well as their suppliers and contractors alike.

Juli Lau is a Legal Director, Colin Ricciardiello is a Partner, Beth Edwards is a Paralegal and Natasha Barlow is a Trainee Solicitor at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.


For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act

FREE DOWNLOAD

LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive

BUY NOW

  More Articles

Icons Hazard

Holiday entitlement and pay for atypical working arrangements: Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] UKSC 21

Julie Bann and David Leach analyse a landmark Supreme Court ruling on holiday entitlement and pay for atypical working arrangements.
Icons House

UK Emission Trading Scheme to include waste incineration installations

Steve Gummer and Gonzalo Puertas take a look at the UK Emission Trading Scheme and new decisions on waste incineration.
Icons Document

Signet Trading Limited v First Property Group – First Award under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 Scheme

Joe Walker and James Nelson outline and analyse the first award under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 Scheme.
Icons Deal

Procurement reforms – implications for procurement challenges and remedies

Colin Ricciardello considers the implications for procurement challenges and remedies arising out of the Government's procurement reforms.
Icons House

Relationship between limitation act and scheme for construction contracts

David Owens and Natasha Barlow look at the implications of Hirst & Another v Dunbar & Others [2022] EWHC 41 (TCC)
Icons House

An Introduction to the Building Safety Act 2022

The Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) received Royal Assent in April 2022. Deborah Down outlines the main provisions.
Icons Date

Tackling Teckal – does the new Procurement Bill adequately deal with the Teckal exemption?

Peter Collins and Sophie Pilcher take a look at whether the new Procurement Bill adequately deals with the Teckal exemption
Icons Hazard

Local authorities on track to more freedom to cut ties with Russian and Belarusian suppliers

Juli Lau and Gonzalo Puertas discuss the increased freedom for Local Authorities to cut ties with Russian and Belarusian suppliers.
Icons Hazard

Nitrogen Credits Commentary

Emily Knowles, Bernadette Hillman and Steve Gummer discuss the impact of nitrate on planning permission and development in the UK.
Icons House

Thurrock Council & Another v Adams & Ors [2022] EWHC 1324 (QB)

William Rose, Partner at Sharpe Pritchard LLP, has successfully acted for Thurrock Council and Essex County Council in obtaining a ‘first of its kind’ injunction against individuals connected with the protest group Just Stop Oil.
Icons Date

The Adjudication Part 3: The Response and Further Submissions 9 June 2022

David Owens and James Goldthorpe look at the responding party's response and further submissions during adjudication.
Icons House

A renewable future: focusing energy solutions at a local level

Natasha Barlow and Steve Gummer discuss the 'Energy Trilemma' and how it is playing out at a local level.
Icons Date

Procurement Bill – Initial impressions from the first draft

Juli Lau and Sophie Mcfie-Hyland outline their initial impressions from the first draft of the Procurement Bill.
Icons Hazard

Let’s paint the town green! Government plans for green homes

Laura Campbell discusses the change urgently needed in towns and cities to make the landscape greener.
Icons House

The Queen’s Speech in Brief

The number of Bills which affect public sector clients is greater than usual – and the government have got straight off the starting blocks by publishing some of them already.
Icons Hazard

Refurbishment and Retrofitting: In with the old, out with the new!

Sharpe Pritchard analyse the challenge of decarbonising the construction sector.
Icons House

NET ZERO – What obligations are there on the UK to achieve it?

Radhika Devesher takes a look at the legal duty to achieve net-zero placed upon the UK.
Icons House

Championing green goals through public buying

Juli Lau considers how public purchasing power can be used to champion Net Zero goals, and how public procurement might be used as another driver for change.
Icons Hazard

Top Tips for Local Authority Lawyers advising on Data Protection Matters

Charlotte Smith and Hannah Peto set out some of their top tips to consider when advising on data protection matters.
Icons Court

The Cost of Freedom of Information – The Council’s Failure to Advise

Charlotte Smith and Nadia Ahmed summarise the case and judgement of Moss v Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames and another (NJ/2018/007).
Icons QA

Ask the team

These are frequently asked questions to our experts from colleagues in Local Government via the Sharpe Pritchard ask the team facility concerning local authority companies, partnerships, charging and trading.
Icons Court

A call to review public contracts with Russian suppliers

Juli Lau and Gonzalo Puertas discuss the first official document to consider public sector contracts with companies linked to the Russian and Belarusian state regimes, issued by the Cabinet Office.
Icons Date

A New NEC Option to tackle greenwashing in the construction industry

Allan Owen and Sophie Drysdale discuss 'greenwashing' in the construction industry and a new secondary option clause X29 for its NEC4 suite of contracts developed by NEC.
Icons House

The Pathway to the Future – The Road Map for Employment Tribunals

David Leach discusses and outlines the road map of the planned changes for modernising the Tribunals in 2022 and 2023 released by The Presidents of the Employment Tribunals.
Icons House

Farrar Out

Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe discuss how the insolvency of Farrar Construction leads to clarity from the Courts on dealing with an insolvent contractor under JCT.
Icons House

The UK government has this week introduced the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill

Peter Collins and Sophie Pilcher discuss the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill introduced by the UK Government this week.
Icons Hazard

A sweet truth for selectivity

Steve Gummer and Gonzalo Puertas discuss a case that concerns an application for judicial review seeking to challenge a decision to introduce a zero-duty autonomous tariff quota (“ATQ”) of 260,000 metric tonnes of raw cane sugar for refining.
Icons House

Adjudication 101: Introduction and Overview

Michael Comba traces the origins of adjudication and considers why the process was introduced, who it is aimed towards and how construction contracts must include certain provisions.
Icons Date

New Government Guidance on PFI Expiry

Rob Hann, Head of Local Government at Sharpe Pritchard, takes a look at new guidance on PFI expiry recently published by the IPA to help public bodies wrestle with the complexities of transition they will face as these contracts reach full term.
Icons Hazard

Three new Levels to ‘level up’ Local Government in England?

Rob Hann, Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of local government, takes a look at the new proposals under the Government’s Levelling Up White Paper to facilitate devolution to remaining regions of local government in England which are currently without a Mayoral Combined Authority.
Icons Hazard

Will employers still be able to use the practice of ‘fire and rehire’ in 2022?

Christian Grierson and Julie Bann discuss a recent case in which the High Court has granted an injunction preventing Tesco from using the controversial employment practice of ‘fire and rehire’.
Slide background