Local Government Lawyer Home Page


Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).

 

                                                                                                  

Slide background

Councils unable to hold meetings remotely from 7th May

Icons CourtRadhika Devesher considers the fallout from the High Court's decision that online council meetings cannot continue past 7th May and outlines the practical steps that councils can take to ensure that the decision-making process is not adversely affected.

You may have heard the recent decision that the High Court has refused to declare that councils may continue to hold meetings remotely on or after 7th May. Although the legislative reasoning is clear, many council officers and members will be considering whether the right decision has been made on a practical level.

As a reminder, here’s what has happened so far:

The Local Authorities and Police and Crime Panels (Coronavirus) (Flexibility of Local Authority and Police and Crime Panel Meetings) (England and Wales) Regulations 2020 (“Regulations”) were brought in on 4th April 2020 under powers granted by section 78 of the Coronavirus Act 2020 to allow local authorities to deal with the challenges of holding physical meetings during the coronavirus pandemic. The Regulations were stated to apply until 7th May 2021. The Regulations allowed for local authorities to hold meetings remotely, for example through digital conference software (e.g. Zoom) or telephone conference calls.

However, they did not mandate such meetings to be held remotely or in a particular format.

Confirmation was provided by the Government to council leaders that the emergency legislation concerning remote meetings would only be in place until 6th May 2021.
Subsequently, Hertfordshire County Council, the Association of Democratic Service Officers and Lawyers in Local Government brought an action asking the High Court to decide whether Schedule 12, Local Government Act 1972 should be interpreted as allowing for virtual meetings, as the legislation was passed at a time when virtual meetings could not have been envisaged.

High Court Decisions

The High Court on 23rd April 2021 held[1] that meetings cannot be held remotely under the Local Government Act 1972 and extending the Regulations would require further emergency legislation.

The case was heard before Dame Victoria Sharp, president of the Queen’s Bench Division, and Mr Justice Chamberlain. The judgment highlighted the importance of being clear on attendance requirements at council meetings to ensure council decisions are validly taken, i.e. whether a meeting was quorate, or whether the majority vote had been achieved. Overlooking such detail may lead to acrimonious disputes, which is why certainty is required as to what constitutes as “present”.

The Court then went on to state that local authority meetings must take place at a single, specified geographical location and that attending a meeting means ‘physical presence at that location’.

Ultimately, the High Court has passed the baton over to the Government to make the decision on whether long-term change is required. In the immediate term, the Government has concluded that it is not possible to secure primary legislation to extend the Regulations beyond the stated date.

If and when such legislation is put in place, key considerations will include (a) circumstances in which remote meetings will be permitted, and (b) what requirements will be in place to ensure that council decisions are validly taken. In an area which will attract many competing views, will such legislation prescribe in detail how meetings should be conducted, or will councils have autonomy to make such decisions?

Subsequently on 4th May 2021, the High Court clarified[2] the outstanding question of whether a meeting is either “open to the public” or “held in public” if the only form of access to the public is via a remote connection. It was held that given the importance given to “physical attendance” following the initial judgement for this matter, “open to public” or “held in public” means that councils will be required to allow people to attend in person at the meeting venue. However, it was noted that this does not prevent councils from broadcasting a meeting via webcam, and councils would still need to take into account Government guidance on Covid-19 safety measures, which could mean restricting the number of attendees.

Practical Considerations

Remote meetings during the pandemic have in some ways increased the accessibility of council meetings for members of public, improving transparency and accountability of local authority decisions. At the same time, council members have benefitted in cost savings, as well as convenience, from being able to dial in to meetings from home. In the midst of a pandemic, the availability of remote meetings has also helped ensure that essential council business continued whilst also prioritising the health and safety of attendees.

On the other hand, poor internet connections, unfamiliarity with technology, and unfortunate mishaps (or deliberate misuse) in relation to video conferencing etiquette, might persuade many that face to face meetings make for more efficient proceedings.

Regardless of the differing preferences on remote meetings, it is important to note that the luxury (or burden) of remote meetings has come to an abrupt halt (albeit that the Regulations have always been clear on when the application of remote meetings would end).

Government Consultation

On 25th March 2021, the Government issued a call for evidence on current arrangements for remote meetings, which requests views and seeks to understand the experience of local authorities on the use of remote or hybrid meetings during the coronavirus pandemic.

Councils have now had the experience of online meetings, albeit a crash course into making it work last year. This consultation allows an informed judgement to be made as to whether the Government should legislate and make remote meetings a permanent fixture, following the lead of the Welsh Government.

Until then, councils elsewhere will need to prepare for the return to face to face meetings, whilst also remaining compliant with Covid-19 guidance to ensure meetings are conducted safely.

[1] Hertfordshire County Council and others v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2021] EWHC 1093 (Admin) (28 April 2021)

[2] Hertfordshire County Council and others v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2021] EWHC 1145 (Admin) (4 May 2021)

Radhika Devesher is a Senior Associate at Sharpe Pritchard LLP


For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act

FREE DOWNLOAD

LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive

BUY NOW

  More Articles

Icons Court

Climate emergency or climate catastrophe?

Rob Hann asks how central & local government departments and councils can work together more effectively to combat the challenges to achieve net zero by 2050.
Icons Court

Big Problems Need Radical Solutions – Time to Play Monopoly with District Heating?

Steve Gummer examines how local authorities might make district heat networks a reality.
<a href=

The Judicial Review and Courts Bill

The Judicial Review and Courts Bill was introduced to the House last week on 21 July 2021. William Rose and Anna Sidebottom discuss the potential impact of the bill.
<a href=

Liquidated damages and termination

Clare Mendelle, Francesca Gallagher and James Goldthorpe provide an outline of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Triple Point Technology vs PTT Public Company Limited.

Mandatory Vaccination for Care Home Workers in England

The Government has announced that people working in care homes in England must be fully vaccinated against Covid-19 from October 2021, unless they have a medical exemption, write Rachel Murray-Smith and Francesca Gallagher.
Icons Court

Transparency in Procurement: Procurement Policy Note (“PPN”) 07/21

Julie Lau, Clare Mendelle and Beth Edwards outline the new regime for publishing procurement notices post-Brexit
Icons Court

When procurement law and contracts for interests in land meet

Colin Ricciardiello provides a case law update examining cases that have examined the overlap between a requirement to procure and a contract for the disposal of an interest in land.
tb w74 h74 crop int a734a5aec8e0dcb7849ee8ebeb84a53d

UK granted data protection adequacy decision

Charlotte Smith summarises the new data protection adequacy decision.

First Impressions on the New Subsidy Control Bill

Last week the Government published its new Subsidy Control Bill. The Bill represents a significant shift in the way in which subsidies are assessed and also provides some clarity about the regime that will replace the EU State aid regime, writes Peter Collins.
Icons Court

Managing new enforcement powers for councils under the Traffic management Act 2004

Rob Hann considers the recent legislative changes to traffic management in England, including the introduction of Clean Air Zones and widening local authorities enforcement powers for moving traffic offences.
Icons Court

Implementing Net Zero: Taking account of Carbon Reduction Plans in the Procurement of Major Government Contracts

The Government recently published the Procurement Policy Note 06/21. This will require suppliers bidding for major government contracts to provide a Carbon Reduction Plan at the selection stage and commit to achieving Net Zero by 2050, writes Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe.
tb w74 h74 crop int a734a5aec8e0dcb7849ee8ebeb84a53d

Public Procurement Update June 2021

On 3 June 2021, the Government issued the National Procurement Policy Statement (NPPS), and the associated Procurement Policy Note (PPN). George Dale explains what each document does.

What a bind: Section 106 planning obligations where there are multiple land interests

Rachel Lee and Christos Paphiti consider whether the case of R (on the application of McLaren) v Woking Borough Council impacts upon local planning authorities (LPAs) ability to properly consider the land interests and parties as regards to performance of specific obligations.
Icons Court

The use of experts only works when everyone plays by the same rules

Colin Ricciardiello looks at the use of expert witnesses in the wake of an important recent decision.
Icons Court

Unlawful Award of Contract

The High Court has ruled that the Minister for the Cabinet Office, Michael Gove, broke the law by giving a contract to a market research company, Public First, who are run by long-time associates of his. Anna Sidebottom, Francesca Gallagher and Clare Mendelle report.
Icons Date

Time after time: extending time for determination of a prior approval application

Rachel Lee and Christos Paphiti examine the time period for determination of Prior Approval (‘PA’) applications and explore how a local authority can extend the time period for determination.
Icons Date

The Cram Slam – Part 26A Restructuring Plans and Commercial Leases

David Nelson looks at the impact on landlords of a controversial High Court decision to allow a restructuring plan for a chain of health clubs.
Icons Court

The limits of an adjudicator's jurisdiction

Dr Paul Hughes and Anna Sidebottom look at the effect of Prater v Sisk [2021] on the ability of an Adjudicator to rely on previous 'out of jurisdiction' decisions between the same parties
Icons House

The Queen’s Speech and Judicial Review

Colin Ricciardiello looks at the likely effects of the government's proposed changes to the judicial review process.
Icons House

The Subsidy Control Bill

Ryan Copeland and James Hughes analyse the main provisions of the Subsidy Control Bill announced in the recent Queen’s speech.
Icons Court

You can’t claim that! Court finds exclusion clauses work just like any other clause

The recent case of Mott MacDonald Limited v Trant Engineering Limited serves as a timely reminder that exclusion clauses in construction contracts can and do work and will be enforced by the courts to prevent what may otherwise be valid claims write Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe.
Icons Date

Sparks Flying: Increasing Network Connectivity For Tenants

Lillee Reid-Hunt, James Nelson and Natasha Barlow look at the potential impact of The Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Act 2021 on reducing delays in the installation of telecommunications equipment to leasehold properties.
Icons House

Subcontract held to govern works commenced before execution

Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe examine a case which considered which terms governed liability for works carried out prior to the execution of a contract.
Icons Court

No overlap between substance and jurisdictional issues

Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe examine the implications of Ex Novo Limited v MPS Housing Limited [2020] EWHC 3804 (TCC)]
Icons Court

Home is where the heart is

Bernadette Hillman and Christos Paphiti outline the new permitted development right and what it means for the property sector and planners
Icons Date

Can a worker get paid for sleeping?

Some jobs such as care workers, security guards and nightwatchmen require the individual to work night shifts where they may, with the approval of their employer, sleep during some or all of the shift, but nevertheless remain on standby during that time.
Icons Date

Can you decline to sponsor skilled workers under the new immigration rules?

Is there an obligation to consider resident workforce prior to employing migrants? Julie Bann and Aleksandra Wolek report.
Icons House

The Long Goodbye to the PFI

Rob Hann, Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government takes a look at the House of Common’s Public Account Committees’ recent report into the pending expiry of PFI contracts which contains some interesting recommendations….
Icons Court

Changes to the Electronic Communications Code

The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport has commenced a consultation on changes to the Electronic Communications Code 2017 (the “Code”). James Nelson, Lillee Reid-Hunt and Natasha Barlow report.
Icons Court

The Heat Networks (Scotland) Bill

Until last week the heat network sector in Scotland was not specifically regulated. The recent Heat Networks (Scotland) Bill seeks to rectify this by creating a regulatory framework and licencing system designed to encourage the increased use of heat networks.
Icons Date

A step in the right direction

Rob Hann and Juli Lau outline Sharpe Pritchard’s response to the Government’s Green Paper on reforming the ‘outdated’ public procurement regime.
Rob Hann

Life on the Edge!

This week sees the launch of Sharpe Edge – the home of Sharpe Pritchard on Local Government Lawyer. We have created Sharpe Edge for local authorities who are looking for ways to help their communities rebuild and regenerate following the devasting impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic.
Icons Court

Teckal and Beyond….

In this article Rob Hann, Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, takes a look at what isn’t covered in the recent Green Paper on Transforming the UK’s Public Procurement rules, namely the exception contained in regulation 12 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015), commonly referred to as the Teckal exemption and asks whether Teckal is ‘fit for purpose’ in a post Brexit, post pandemic environment?
Icons Court

Jurisdiction Clauses & Enforcing Adjudication Decisions

The case of Motacus Constructions Ltd v Paolo Castelli Spa [2021] EWHC 356 (TCC) confirms adjudication’s status as an interim-binding measure and reinforces its importance as a dispute resolution forum in the construction industry.
Icons Date

Procurement in an Emergency – Requirements for Transparency

Public procurement has never had such a high profile as it has in recent months and most especially since the decision in Good Law Project and Others v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care ([2021] EWHC 346 (Admin)). However, in practice, has anything changed?
Icons Court

Disallowed Costs, Definitions and Default

The recent case of ABC Electrification Limited v Network Infrastructure Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 1645 saw legal practitioners jousting over the definition of a solitary word – namely, “default”. In this case regarding the scope of ‘Disallowed Costs’ in a common rail industry contract, the Court of Appeal issued a stark reminder to contractors that the meaning of individual words can be the difference between millions of pounds.
Slide background