Local Government Reorganisation: Why councils should start with their corporate structures

Peter Collins discusses the lesser-considered elements of local government reorganisation.

When local government reorganisation is discussed, the conversation naturally gravitates towards the big-ticket issues.

• Governance
• Staffing
• Service delivery
• Property portfolios
• Constitutions

Yet beneath the surface sits another area that deserves equal attention: council-owned companies and corporate vehicles.

For many authorities, these organisations quietly deliver services, hold valuable assets or support regeneration projects. Some have existed for decades. Others were created to respond to specific commercial opportunities or funding arrangements. During periods of organisational change, they can easily fall below the radar simply because the immediate focus lies elsewhere.

That would be a mistake.

As councils prepare for vesting day, understanding the full extent of their corporate interests should be regarded as an essential part of transition planning, not an afterthought. Failing to identify them early can create governance uncertainty, operational disruption and avoidable legal complications long after the new authority has come into existence.

Knowing what you own sounds obvious, and one of the first questions I encourage councils to ask is deceptively simple:

Do we know exactly what companies and joint ventures we own?

The answer is not always as straightforward as it might appear.

Many authorities have established different corporate vehicles over many years, often for entirely legitimate reasons. Housing delivery companies, property investment vehicles, Teckal companies, LLPs, regeneration partnerships and shared service organisations may all have been created at different times, by different administrations and for different policy objectives.

Some remain central to service delivery.

Others may now be largely dormant, holding little more than land, contractual rights or historic obligations.

That diversity is precisely why a comprehensive review is worthwhile.

Looking beyond the company register

Preparing an inventory is about far more than producing a list of company names.

Decision-makers need to understand:

• What legal entities exist?
• What percentage ownership does the council hold?
• Are there any minority shareholders or commercial partners?
• Why was each vehicle originally established?
• Does it still serve its intended purpose?

Without that wider context, councils may find themselves inheriting governance responsibilities without fully understanding the organisations behind them.

Institutional knowledge has its limits

One challenge that frequently arises is that knowledge of historic corporate structures often sits with a relatively small number of officers.

Over time, those individuals may retire, move roles or become involved in transition work elsewhere within the authority.

If identifying every subsidiary depends upon several spreadsheets, archived business cases and individual recollections, Local Government Reorganisation provides an opportunity to create something far more robust.

A single, reliable record of the council's corporate interests becomes invaluable, not simply for vesting day but for future governance.

The opportunity behind the exercise

Although the exercise is often viewed as one of risk management, it can also generate wider benefits.

Understanding the council's corporate portfolio enables authorities to assess whether existing structures remain aligned with strategic objectives, whether governance arrangements are still appropriate and where future efficiencies may be achieved.

Those conversations may ultimately lead to further decisions later in the reorganisation process, but they begin with one relatively simple task: understanding what exists today.

Looking ahead

Local Government Reorganisation inevitably requires authorities to make difficult decisions across numerous workstreams. Council-owned companies should not be overlooked simply because they operate outside the day-to-day visibility of the authority.

Establishing a clear picture of the corporate landscape early allows governance, ownership and future decision-making to be approached with greater confidence as vesting day draws nearer.

Peter Collins is a Partner at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.

---

For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

 

 

Visit Sharpe Pritchard's new Building Safety Hub, focusing on The Building Safety Act 2022 and its wide-ranging impact.

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..