Local Government Lawyer Home Page

Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).



Slide background

Environment Act 2021: What Does it Mean for Waste Authorities?

<a href=Sally Stock, Juli Lau, Ellen Painter and Beth Edwards discuss notable changes made to the Environment Bill 2021-2022, which received Royal Assent on the 9th November.



After a number of iterations and delays, the highly anticipated Environment Bill 2021-22 (the “Bill”), which returned to Parliament in May, received Royal Assent at midnight on 9 November. As such, the Environment Act 2021 (the “Act”) is now law.

The Act contains several provisions relating to waste which waste collection and waste disposal authorities (“WCAs” and “WDAs”, respectively) should be aware of.

Separation of Waste

Section 57 of the Act replaces Section 45A Environmental Protection Act 1990 (“EPA 1990”) on waste collection and inserts new Sections 45AZA-AZG. Notable changes include:

  • Recyclable household waste must be collected separately from other household waste, for recycling or composting (‘recyclable household waste’ being defined in the amended EPA 1990 to reference specific recyclable waste streams). The Secretary of State (“SoS”) will have the power to add further recyclable waste streams.
  • Recyclable household waste must be collected as individual streams unless the exceptions in the new Section 45A(6) EPA 1990 apply. To rely on these exceptions, a WCA must provide a written assessment stating it considers that separate collection:
  • Would not be technically or economically practicable; or
  • Has no significant environmental benefit
  • In any case, dry recyclable waste streams must never be mixed with food or garden waste streams.
  • Food waste collection must take place at least once a week.

It should also be noted that these requirements are applicable to “relevant waste” (i.e. recyclable waste akin to household waste, other than garden waste) from non-residential properties, commercial waste and industrial waste collections.

We anticipate that these changes will have the following implications on WCAs and WDAs:

  • Where WCAs do not already collect food or garden waste and/or separately collect dry recycling, they may face increased costs relating to staffing, vehicles, and containers.
  • Some WCAs charge for the collection of garden waste using the exception in Schedule 1 Paragraph 4 Controlled Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2012. However, under the Act, WCAs are not permitted to charge for the collection of food waste. Therefore, if WCAs decide to collect garden and food waste together, charging for collection may be viewed as a breach of their statutory duties.
  • Moving towards increased collections and different containers may lead to confusion or non-compliance by residents.
  • Current waste collection contracts need to be reviewed to determine whether any changes to service provision requirements are necessary and whether any ‘Change in Law’ provisions are triggered. This may result in WCAs having to vary their existing contracts. Future procurements should also take into account the changes made by the Act.
  • The implementation of separate collections as intended by the Act is likely to lead to changes in the composition and volumes of residual household and recyclable waste collected, and accordingly delivered to WDA facilities and contractors.
  • Composition and tonnage changes may require variations (possibly significant ones) to long term disposal and treatment facilities and could impact contractually agreed positions in long term disposal contracts.

Local authorities may be concerned about the increased monetary obligations created by the Act. The Government has stated in its waste and resource efficiency factsheet that it “recognises the financial pressures local authorities face and will ensure that costs arising from new statutory duties such as those proposed in the Bill are covered.” The detail of any available funding remains to be seen.

Other Key Amendments

The Act also:

  • Inserts new Sections 34CA-B EPA 1990 to create a power for the SoS to make regulations to establishing an electronic waste tracking
  • Creates a new Section 62ZA EPA 1990, which gives the SoS the power to make regulations in connection with the regulation of hazardous waste in England. These could include prohibiting or restricting where hazardous waste can be kept or who can control it.
  • Amends section 141 of the EPA 1990 which allows the SoS to make regulations relating to the importation and export of waste or the transit of waste for export.
  • Amends Part 4 of the EPA 1990 in relation to littering enforcement powers.

Enforcement of the Act

Part 1, Chapter 2 of the Act establishes the Office of Environmental Protection (“OEP”) which has been working on an interim basis since 1 July 2021.

The OEP is designed to undertake the scrutiny functions that (prior to Brexit) were carried out by the European Commission and the European Environment Agency, as well as advising Government on environmental issues and enforcing against breaches of environmental law.

During the Act’s passage through Parliament, there has been some debate between the Houses over the independence of the OEP.

The final version of the Act removes an amendment made by the Lords, and instead retains the requirement for the OEP to comply with guidance issued by the SoS when developing policy and carrying out its functions, but with the addition of increased Parliamentary scrutiny of the guidance.

When do the provisions come into force?

Although the Act has now received Royal Assent, the only provisions which immediately come into force are largely procedural. A number of provisions relating to the OEP, its objectives, and the development and publication of its strategy came into force on 17 November 2021.

The provisions on electronic waste tracking will come into force on 9 January 2022.

The other provisions referred to in this article will become law on the day the SoS approves them and remain law unless challenged within 40 days by either House raising a motion. The government have stated in their waste and resource efficiency fact sheet that they will “allow local authorities sufficient time to adapt to their new duties and to communicate changes with householders.

We advise waste collection and disposal authorities on all manner of issues relating to their statutory duties, and our Waste team is at hand to assist authorities with addressing the implications under the Act and any subsequent legislation.

Sally Stock is a Partner, Juli Lau is Legal Director, Ellen Painter is a Solicitor and Beth Edwards is a Paralegal at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.

For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act


LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive


  More Articles

Icons Hazard

Unconscious Bias, Discrimination and a Warning to Public Sector Employers

Christian Grierson and Julie Bann discuss two employment tribunal judgements, which provide a stark warning to public sector employers about unconscious bias and discrimination.
<a href=

Levelling up – A new opportunity for further devolution in England?

Rob Hann explores the Government's 'levelling up' policy and looks at whether it is an opportunity for further devolution in England.
<a href=

Time limits for commencing proceedings in procurement challenges

Colin Ricciardiello discusses a landmark procurement challenge judgment on the time limit for commencing proceedings.
Icons Hazard

The Revised National Planning Policy Framework: Better design, greener outcomes?

Alastair Lewis and Sarah Wertheim outline the latest National Planning Policy Framework changes and explain how future developments will be impacted by the new rules.
<a href=

Loose talk costs money: Oral agreement to forego liquidated damages was valid

Michael Comba outlines and analyses a contract dispute resolution: Mansion Place Ltd v Fox Industrial Services Ltd [2021] EWHC 2972 (TCC)
<a href=

Procurement reform – an update

Radhika Devesher and Natasha Barlow provide a summary of the proposed and enacted changes to the UK procurement regime post-Brexit.
Icons Court

The Public Procurement Review Service Report: Procurement Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Juli Lau and Beth Edwards examine some of the most common procurement pitfalls and provide a checklist of points for local authorities to bear in mind in order to avoid costly errors.
<a href=

JCT Dispute Adjudication Board Rules: a case of “three’s a crowd”?

Peter Jansen who specialises in construction law and dispute resolution, examines the roles and functions of the JCT’s Dispute Adjudication Board and highlights some key considerations for parties planning to adopt the Rules in their JCT contracts.
<a href=

The Electric Vehicle Revolution or…

Emily Knowles discusses new legislation on the requirement of electric vehicle charging points, and its potential impact on the Electric Vehicle Revolution.
<a href=

Consultation on the Electronic Communications Code – What’s Changing?

Lillee Reid-Hunt outlines the legislative changes to the Electronic Communications Code.
Icons Court

You Must Adjudicate First NEC3 imposes obligation to adjudicate first before commencing court proceedings.

Michael Comba discusses NEC3 imposing an obligation to adjudicate first before commencing court proceedings.
Icons Court

Rocking aground the Christmas tree

Clare Mendelle and George Dale discuss and solve a common construction scenario, looking at the position under the Contract, and how the Employer should deal with the Contractor's request.
Icons Hazard

Adequacy Decision Granted to the UK

Charlotte Smith considers two recent adequacy decisions and explains how this affects existing data practices.
<a href=

Managing employees with long COVID and employees who have anxiety about returning to the office

Julie Bann and Victoria Smith consider how Long Covid may be treated under existing employment laws and provide compliance guidance for employers.
<a href=

ESG and its relevance to the public sector

Peter Collins and Sydney Chandler discuss the growing importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria in public procurement.
<a href=

JCT 101: Time and Punishment

Rachel Murray-Smith, Clare Mendelle and Laura Campbell discuss a common Construction scenario regarding the Practical Completion of a project, and the position under the unamended JCT DB 2016.
Icons Court

The importance of due process, communication and fairness in employee conduct investigations – what you need to know.

Julie Bann and James Hughes discuss the importance of fairness in employee conduct investigations, taking a look at the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham -v- Mr S Keable case.
<a href=

Becoming More Inclusive: VAT and Public Procurement

Juli Lau, Natasha Barlow and Beth Edwards examine the recently published Public Procurement Regulations 2021, focussing upon amendments to the thresholds within various procurement regimes.
<a href=

The LADs are Alright

Laura Campbell discusses liquidated damages in construction contracts, focussing upon the long-running Triple Point saga which ended in the Supreme Court this year.
<a href=

Procurement Policy Note 08/21

Juli Lau and Beth Edwards outline Procurement Policy Note 08/21, recently published by the Cabinet office.
Icons Court

Hard Times: Improving Air Quality with Clean Air Zones

Rob Hann and James Goldthorpe examine the introduction of Clean Air Zones to improve air quality across the UK.
<a href=

Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021 – What Public Bodies Need To Know

Rob Hann and James Hughes examine the Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021, looking at what Public Bodies need to know.
<a href=

Net Zero – What’s new for local authorities?

Steve Gummer and Sophie Drysdale look at two major climate publications: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and the Net Zero Strategy.
Icons Hazard

Jumping to conclusions: Final Statements, liquidated damages and material breaches of natural justice

Michael Comba looks at a recent Technology and Construction Court case that provides useful guidance on the JCT’s procedural requirements on disputing Final Statements.
Icons Court

Three times one equals one: Several disputed payment applications amount to a single dispute

Michael Comba considers a case in which the High Court dismissed an employer’s argument that an adjudicator lacked jurisdiction because the referral concerned three separate payment applications and, therefore, comprised three separate disputes.
<a href=

Warm feelings or hot air: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and Heat Networks

This week the government published its Heat and Buildings Strategy (Strategy). This contained vital innovations and essential step changes in terms of how heating is provided, writes Steve Gummer.
<a href=

Procurement reforms: update from Cabinet Office

Rob Hann, Nicola Sumner and Juli Lau assess the Cabinet Office's update on the progress of the government's public procurement reforms.
Icons Court

Bond, Performance Bond. Delivering value for the Public Sector?

Justin Mendelle examines whether public sector clients achieve value for money from the provision of performance bonds.
Icons Hazard

Not so personal messages: R. (on the application of Good Law Project Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and Abingdon Health Plc [2021] EWHC 2595 (TCC)

Nicola Sumner, Juli Lau and Beth Edwards look at The Good Law Project's challenge of the direct award by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care of three contracts for the production and supply of rapid Covid-19 antibody tests (the “Contracts”).
<a href=

Insolvency – Termination and Beyond

Rachel Murray-Smith and Clare Mendelle consider the potential warning signs of, and the compliant manner for dealing with, contractor insolvency.
Icons Court

Settlement agreements – waiving Personal Injury claims

In the case of Farnham-Oliver v RM Educational Resources LTD, the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court allowed a Personal Injury claim (“PI claim”) to be pursued by an employee against his former employer despite the parties signing a Settlement Agreement in respect of an Employment Tribunal claim on the same issue. Julie Bann and James Hughes report.
Icons Hazard

Mandatory Vaccination for Care Home Workers in England – Update

Rachel Murray-Smith and Francesca Gallagher look at the detail of the government's guidance on compulsory vaccination for care staff.
<a href=

Make your mind up! Liquidated Damages clause upheld despite Employer’s challenge

In the recent case of Eco World Ballymore (EWB) v Dobler[1] , an Employer took the unusual position of challenging their own entitlement to liquidated damages (LDs) on the ground that the LDs provision constituted an unenforceable penalty clause. Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe investigate.
<a href=

Are Collateral Warranties Construction Contracts? Timing is Key.

Clare Mendelle and Anna Sidebottom examine the recently decided case of Toppan v Simply[1], which has provided guidance on when collateral warranties may be considered “construction contracts” under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 and so give the warranty holder the right to adjudicate.
Icons Court

Climate emergency or climate catastrophe?

Rob Hann asks how central & local government departments and councils can work together more effectively to combat the challenges to achieve net zero by 2050.
Slide background