Regulations have been laid aimed at introducing greater openness in executive council meetings, but concerns have emerged over the speed of implementation and the challenge of complying with one of the main requirements.

The changes, which will apply from 10 September, include a presumption that all executive meetings will be held in public “unless a narrowly defined legal exception applies”.

There are also provisions covering new legal rights for ‘citizen bloggers’ as well as enhanced rights for individual councillors and scrutiny members.

Communities Secretary Eric Pickles said: "Every decision a council takes has a major impact on the lives of local people so it is crucial that whenever it takes a significant decision about local budgets that affect local communities whether it is in a full council meeting or in an unheard of sub-committee it has got to be taken in the full glare of all the press and any of the public.”

The major changes brought in under The Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012 are:

In relation to the recording of executive decisions, the existing regime means that only "key decisions" made by officers require a written statements setting out reasons with such decisions to be available for insection. 

However, the new regulations require an officer making a decision "which is an executive decision" to produce a written statement and make it available for inspection, including on the authority's website. This has been interpreted as meaning that councils will need to identify all decisions being made under their delegated authority as executive decisions so that these provisions can be met.

Allan Wells, legal services lead manager at Surrey County Council, said the change to recording officer decision-making “clearly presents a logistical challenge”.

He added: “The reality for us at Surrey is that officers don't make key decisions so the requirement for a written statement from them does not arise at present. However, to have to include details of all executive decisions made by officers is a major shift requiring new processes to be set up, and there has been no lead in time for this at all.”

Nicholas Dobson, a consultant at Pannone, said there were fears that some authorities "might spend a disproportionate effort in publicising a multitude of minor administrative decisions". He added that clarity from the DCLG on the issue would be welcome.

The Regulations can be found here

Philip Hoult