Ministers promise councils greater freedoms over travellers site provision PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 26 March 2012 00:00

Streamlined government guidance will put the provision of travellers sites “back into the hands of local councils, in consultation with local communities”, ministers have claimed.

The revised guidance issued by the Department for Communities and Local Government is just eight pages long, compared to 54 previously.

Ministers said local authorities would have the “freedom and responsibility” to determine the right level of site provision in their area.

The guidance sets out the Government’s view that traveller sites are inappropriate development for Green Belt land. “[It] makes clear that there should be due regard for the protection of the local environment and amenities when local authorities set out their criteria for allocating sites,” it adds.

The Department also said there would be changes to planning law to limit retrospective planning applications for any form of unauthorised development, as well as the introduction of incentives for new and refurbished traveller sites. This will deliver a better balance between site provision and enforcement, it argued.

The DCLG has identified a number of “key aims” in relation to travellers sites. These are:

  • “local planning authorities should make their own assessment of need for the purposes of planning;
  • to ensure that local planning authorities, working collaboratively, develop fair and effective strategies to meet need through the identification of land for sites;
  • to encourage local planning authorities to plan for sites over a reasonable timescale;
  • that plan-making and decision-taking should protect the Green Belt from inappropriate development;
  • to promote more private traveller site provision while recognising that there will always be those travellers who cannot provide their own sites;
  • that plan-making and decision-taking should aim to reduce the number of unauthorised developments and encampments and make enforcement more effective;
  • for local planning authorities to ensure their local plan includes fair, realistic and inclusive policies;
  • to increase the number of traveller sites in appropriate locations with planning permission, to address under-provision and maintain an appropriate level of supply;
  • to reduce tensions between settled and traveller communities in plan-making and planning decisions;
  • to enable provision of suitable accommodation from which travellers can access education, health, welfare and employment infrastructure; and
  • for local planning authorities to have due regard to the protection of local amenities and the local environmental.”

The Government suggested that planning rules had harmed community relations over recent years, “by imposing top-down targets for traveller sites on local councils, increasing the number of unauthorised sites, and compelling councils to encroach onto the Green Belt”.

Ministers also argued that previous policy had created a perception of special treatment for some travellers, and that this undermined the notion of fair play in the system.

The DCLG insisted that its changes would reduce tensions between settled and traveller communities.

Local Government Minister Bob Neill said: "Top-down targets from central Government failed to provide adequate land for travellers and caused tensions with the local settled community. People want to see fair play in the planning system, treating everyone fairly and equally.

"These new policies will allow local authorities to govern their own affairs whilst ensuring that both travellers and the settled communities get a fair deal through the planning system."

A report from a Ministerial Working Group examining the inequalities faced by traveller groups is expected shortly.

The revised policy can be downloaded here.

 

Latest News

July 28, 2014

Law Commission includes DoLS and Wales projects in next programme

A law reform project to consider how deprivation of liberty should be authorised and supervised in settings other than hospitals and care homes has been included in the Law Commission’s 12th programme of law reform. Read more
July 28, 2014

London borough approves abolition of its regional planning committees

The London Borough of Redbridge agreed earlier this month to abolish regional planning committees. Read more
July 25, 2014

Borough launches legal action against neighbour over failure to cooperate

Luton Borough Council has launched judicial review proceedings against a neighbouring authority over its decision to grant planning permission for a major urban extension. Read more
July 22, 2014

Housebuilder launches Planning Court challenge to neighbourhood plan

A housebuilder has launched a judicial review challenge to a neighbourhood plan with the Planning Court. Read more
July 21, 2014

Law Society delays new CON 29 and CON 29O enquiry forms

The Law Society has delayed the introduction of new CON 29 and CON 29O enquiry forms. Read more
July 18, 2014

Council slams ministers for revoking Art 4 direction on office-to-flats conversions

The London Borough of Islington has reacted angrily to a decision by ministers to revoke an Article 4 direction that the council had made removing permitted development rights to convert properties from office to… Read more
July 18, 2014

Building owner to pay £40k+ after failure to comply with enforcement notice

A building owner must pay more than £40,000 as part of a crackdown by Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea planning enforcement officers in some of London’s most exclusive areas. Read more

 

Features

projects portrait1
July 24, 2014

CIL – a reminder on s106 and s278 restrictions

Caroline Bywater looks at what will happen if local authorities do not have a charging schedule in place for the Community Infrastructure Levy by April 2015. Read more
environment portrait1
July 10, 2014

Sustainable development: the Humpty Dumpty approach

Sue Chadwick looks at the challenges thrown up by the concept of 'sustainable development'. Read more
July 03, 2014

Judicial review, proportionality and s.178 direct action

A senior Court of Appeal judge has rejected an argument that proportionality was a matter for the Court on an application for judicial review of a planning authority's decision to take direct action to remove travellers. Read more
June 26, 2014

Speaking up

The High Court ruled earlier this year in a case where a non-planning councillor spoke at a planning committee meeting. Mary Tate examines the ruling. Read more
June 26, 2014

The local authorities’ perspective on fracking

David Brammer discusses the role local government has to play in awarding fracking rights and regulating the industry. Read more
June 19, 2014

Variation of planning obligations

Kamran Hyder examines s. 106BA of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and the new process to modify or discharge affordable housing obligations. Read more
June 19, 2014

Heritage partnership agreements

Richard Harwood QC discusses the new power to enter into heritage agreements under s. 26A of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. Read more
June 19, 2014

Green day

Significant rulings continue to be handed down by the courts in relation to town and village greens. Antonia Murillo reviews the latest judgments. Read more

 

Older news and features

June 26, 2014

Speaking up

June 19, 2014

Green day

May 15, 2014

The winning shot?

April 16, 2014

Setting planning fees

Click here for full section archive

Now Previewing on LGL.tv: Green Belt Development - The Legal Issues (Click on bottom right of screen for full size.)

Featured Jobs

Ashford Borough Council Planning Lawyer
Christchurch and East Dorsets Councils


CLICK HERE to search all current vacancies

Featured Courses & Events

50% off LGLtv subscriptions

Sign up for Courses and Events Updates

* indicates required

Services v2

Yellow pages iStock 000009762383XSmall cropTo access details of individual advertisers, please click on the relevant banner below.

To search all entries in the Local Government Lawyer Services Directory, please click here

 

Ivy Legal

 


 Shout_to_the_top_looking_left_iStock_000006002590XSmall_98x74 Latest Blog Posts

 

 


 

Ballot_iStock_000006080605XSmall_thumb

Snap Judgement

Will the SRA's decision to remove the 16 hour minimum training requirement...