Children's Commissioner inquiry finds "clear evidence" of illegal exclusions at schools PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 19 March 2012 17:13

An inquiry set up by the Children’s Commissioner for England this week claimed to have uncovered “clear evidence” of illegal exclusions at schools.

In a report called They Never Give Up On You, the inquiry team said this evidence ranged from cases where Year 11 students were sent home at Christmas and told not to come back until their exams in June, to ‘informal’ exclusions when someone was told verbally, with no correspondence with parents, to go home for a few days, or not to come back before the school has interviewed their parents.

“This informal ‘sending home’, not recorded and done ‘by the back door’ is illegal,” the Commissioner, Dr Maggie Atkinson, said.

The inquiry – the first to be undertaken by a Children’s Commissioner using powers under the Children Act 2004 – also urged the Government to reverse recent changes brought in through the Academies Act.

These saw the removal of the right of pupils and parents to appeal against unfair exclusions, and have a binding judgement given if a school has acted unfairly.

The report said the system of Independent Review Panels introduced by the 2011 Act, where panels do not have the ability to insist on reinstatement, did not offer sufficient safeguards against schools acting unreasonably or unlawfully. The new panels are also inconsistent with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, it claimed.

The report meanwhile cited allegations from a barrister specialising in education law, David Wolfe, that some academies were illegally stopping students from appealing against exclusions, “because their funding contracts are between the school and government, and do not include rights for the child or family”.

The report suggested that students should only be excluded if they are harming themselves or others, or if they are preventing others from learning. “They should not be excluded for minor breaches of school rules,” it said.

A clearly understood, consistently applied sliding scale of punishment should be used with exclusion as an “absolute last resort”, the inquiry added.

The report also recommended that:

  • The Government should conduct full research into the extent of unlawful exclusions, and investigate as a matter of urgency allegations of a breach of the law;
  • Where Ofsted finds evidence of unlawful activity in the course of an inspection, the school should automatically receive a grading of ‘inadequate’;
  • Concerted action be taken to close gaps that see children with certain backgrounds more likely to be excluded. Government statistics showed that “a Black boy from an African Caribbean background, who has SEN and is also from a low income household, is 168 times more likely to be permanently excluded from the same school than a White female classmate, who does not have SEN and comes from a more affluent household”;
  • The Department for Education issue clear and transparent guidance for the exclusion thresholds that schools use to decide on what to do when dealing with a child at risk of exclusion;
  • More should be done to improve young people and their parents’ knowledge of exclusions policy and procedures. The report claimed that many did not know their rights and so did not know when a school was acting unreasonably, "or in extreme cases, illegally".

The inquiry nevertheless concluded that most schools worked hard to cater for troubled students.

Dr Atkinson said: "For the first time schools are on record saying they had illegally excluded pupils. Due to the informal nature of such exclusions it is difficult to know how widespread this practice is but it is worth further examination. Our inquiry, which took evidence from a wide range of education partners and young people, found both good practice and serious causes for concern.

“Our report recognises that exclusion may in rare cases be a necessary last resort. It should happen only if a child is a danger to his or herself or others, or when learning is so disrupted that only exclusion is possible. But all exclusions must be within the law. They must be seen to be fair, and proven to be effective in solving the problems they are meant to address."

The report can be viewed here.

 

Latest News

August 20, 2014

Government expands Troubled Families programe to cover children under five

The Government is to expand its Troubled Families programme from working with school-age children to those under the age of five with the aim of giving them a better start in life, the Communities Secretary has… Read more
August 19, 2014

Top judge consults on next steps for increased transparency in Family Court

The President of the Family Division has issued a consultation on further steps to increase transparency in the Family Court. Read more
August 15, 2014

Council and special school threatened with legal action over use of 'calm room'

A local authority and a community special school are facing legal action on behalf of two autistic pupils over the use of a ‘calm room’ to manage their behaviours. Read more
August 13, 2014

Supreme Court grants permission to appeal in disability living allowance case

The Contact a Family charity has welcomed a Supreme Court decision to allow a family to appeal against their son's loss of disability living allowance (DLA) when he was in hospital. Read more
August 13, 2014

Welsh Government bolsters rules on social services and Welsh language

The Welsh Government has strengthened rules on provision of care services through the Welsh language. Read more
August 07, 2014

Grandmother to receive £20k from county council over care for grandson

A grandmother has secured £20,000 from Northamptonshire County Council following a three-year legal case over payments to help her care for her grandson. Read more
August 04, 2014

Council policy on supporting families with no recourse to public funds "unlawful"

A London borough’s policy on supporting families with no recourse to public funds was unlawful, a High Court judge has ruled. Read more

 

Features

Child evidence 2 iStock 000004679292XSmall 146x219
August 14, 2014

'Hearing' the child in Family Proceedings

Jacqueline Matthews-Stroud looks at the philosophical, yet important practical, issue of how and when to hear from children themselves. Read more
Child removal iStock 000007583512XSmall 146x219
August 06, 2014

Post-adoption contact - recent developments

Martin Kingerley considers the issue of applications for post-adoption contact in light of the Children and Families Act 2014. Read more
August 07, 2014

Supporting people with no recourse to public funds

A High Court judge has ruled that a council's policy on support for those with no recourse to public funds was unlawful. Shu Shin Luh and Noel Arnold explain why. Read more
August 07, 2014

Judicial review and the new regime for school exclusions

Thomas Ogg looks at the lessons to be learned from the first judicial review under the new regime for school exclusions. Read more
July 31, 2014

Approaching cases of Fictitious or Induced Illness

Kate Grieve highlights the key guidance and forensic considerations in cases of Fictitious or Induced Illness. Read more
July 31, 2014

Enforced academisation

James Goudie QC analyses the outcome of a recent High Court challenge to the Education Secretary’s decision to convert a school into an academy. Read more
July 24, 2014

Article 15 - when should it be used in care cases?

Hannah Markham deals with the vexed issues of jurisdiction and transferring care cases between countries. Read more
July 24, 2014

Academies and FOI

In an academies case, the First-tier Tribunal has recently considered issues around freedom of information and the boundaries of public and private service provision. Robin Hopkins looks at the lessons to be learned. Read more

 

Older news and features

July 31, 2014

Enforced academisation

July 24, 2014

Academies and FOI

May 22, 2014

Disclosure update

Click here for full section archive

Banner

Featured Jobs


CLICK HERE to search all current vacancies

Featured Courses & Events

50% off LGLtv subscriptions

Sign up for Courses and Events Updates

* indicates required

Services v2

Yellow pages iStock 000009762383XSmall cropTo access details of individual advertisers, please click on the relevant banner below.

To search all entries in the Local Government Lawyer Services Directory, please click here

 

Legal Document Translation
No 37 Park Square Chambers

 


 Shout_to_the_top_looking_left_iStock_000006002590XSmall_98x74 Latest Blog Posts

 

 


 

Ballot_iStock_000006080605XSmall_thumb

Snap Judgement

Do you expect to be employed within an ABS in five years' time?