Is comment free? Print E-mail
Thursday, 26 May 2011 00:00

How can local authorities respond to defamatory comments on the web? Wesley O'Brien looks at the options.

In these times of austerity, many public bodies are making very difficult decisions which impact on staff and service users. The increased level of awareness and scrutiny of these decisions, coupled with the prevalence of social networking sites and online forums, means that local authorities are fighting a daily battle against critical comments posted online, some of which stray into the realms of libel.

Examples of these that we have advised on include:

  • an anonymous blogger making repeated defamatory statements against a councillor and the council;
  • defamatory statements made in the press and on websites by a former councillor; and
  • defamatory statements made online by a serving BNP councillor against individual named officers.

In March 2011, the BBC reported that a Caerphilly councillor had agreed to pay £3,000 compensation together with “substantial” legal costs and to publish an apology, after he posted a libellous comment about a political rival on Twitter.

This article answers the ten most common questions we receive from our local authority clients about this issue.

1. How do I know whether a statement is defamatory?

A statement, whether spoken or written, is defamatory if it is said, or sent, to a third party and if it contains an untrue imputation against the reputation of an individual, company or organisation. Whether a statement is defamatory is a question of fact that the court will determine. The court will apply the natural and ordinary meaning of the words used, or any special meaning known to the third party to whom the words were spoken or sent.

2. Who is responsible for the publication?

The individual posting the comments is primarily liable. However, the operator of the website and the web host may also be liable if they have been made aware of the defamatory material. To find out who is running the website, the operator’s contact details may often be on the website itself. If it is not obvious, the contact details of the domain name owner will be held by the domain name registrar. Various searches can be carried out to establish this.

3. Who is entitled to sue?

A defamation claim can be brought by, amongst others, an individual (and in certain circumstances a group of individuals), limited companies, firms and LLPs. A claim cannot currently be brought by a local authority or by central government or by any other democratically elected governmental body.

4. Can a local authority fund the costs of a claim brought by its employee against a third party?

As the law currently stands, a local authority can fund a claim brought by an individual officer and it can also assist an officer in defending such a claim, where it considers such public expenditure to be justified. The position is, however, different for members where a local authority is only entitled to fund a defence, but not a claim brought by an individual member. The only condition is that the statements made must refer to and be defamatory of the individual concerned.

In all cases you should bear in mind the potential cost, staff time and adverse publicity that a decision to fund a claim or defence could bring.

5. Can I get damages?

Yes, provided you are entitled to make out a claim and you succeed in your claim, the court will award you damages. Damages in a defamation claim are intended to compensate the claimant for the damage caused by the statement to the claimant’s reputation. The current perceived limit for damages in such a claim is £200,000. However damages awards are frequently less than £10,000.

6. Are there any practical steps I can take to limit the damage caused?

It is always worth checking the website’s content policy as it may be possible to request the removal of defamatory material by contacting the web host direct.  Unfortunately, the content policy of a number of popular blog sites such as Twitter and Google’s Blogger and Blogspot do not contain any such provision. Others, including  wordpress.com, do. Although they will be responsible for the publication, the law provides web hosts and operators with a defence to a claim provided that they took reasonable care in relation to the publication, and did not know or had no reason to believe that what they did caused or contributed to the publication. In practice, it is very difficult for web hosts to rely on this defence once they have been put on notice that they are hosting or making available the alleged defamatory material.

In all cases, including those where it is not possible to make out a claim, it is worth considering whether to formally engage with the person making the statement in  order to allay their concerns and to provide them with all the relevant facts. This may help prevent further defamatory statements being made. A positive publicity campaign counteracting the adverse comments may also assist.

7. What defences might be raised?

There are three main defences to a defamation claim:

  • Justification is the ultimate defence and requires the maker of the statement to prove that the meaning of the defamatory statement is substantially true. They would therefore have to demonstrate that the “sting” or “gist” of the libel is true.
  • “Honest comment”: this requires proof that the words are: (1) comment and not a statement of fact; (2) based on facts which are true or privileged; and (3) on a matter or public interest. Whether a matter is one of public interest depends on the factual circumstances in each case; however, it has been held that the private character and conduct of a person who fills a public office or takes part in public affairs may be the subject for honest comment in so far as it has reference to or tends to throw light on his or her fitness to occupy the office or perform the duties, but not otherwise. The administration of a local authority is also a matter of public interest. This defence is defeated by malice, which is established if the claimant shows that the defendant acted from an improper motive (e.g. spite, or revenge or personal gain). Proof that the defendant was aware that the statement in question was untrue, or was reckless as to its truth, is conclusive evidence of malice.
  • Qualified privilege: this defence is available in a range of situations and arises where the person who makes the statement has an interest or a legal, social or moral duty to make it to the person to whom it is made. As with the defence of honest comment, qualified privilege is defeated if the maker of the statement was motivated by malice. Where the statements have been posted online (e.g. in a blog or on Twitter, both of which are potentially viewable by anyone) it would be difficult for the maker to demonstrate that the statements were made only to those who had an interest in receiving the statements (i.e. the community served by the local authority).

The Ministry of Justice is currently consulting on proposals to reform the libel laws, including a draft Defamation Bill. If the Bill is enacted in its current form, the common law defences of justification and honest comment would be replaced by equivalent statutory defences, and a new defence of “responsible publication on a matter of public interest” introduced which would provide a defence where the maker can show that the statement complained of was, or formed part of, a statement on a matter of public interest, and that he or she acted responsibly in publishing the statement. The Bill would also extend the circumstances in which the defence of qualified privilege applies.

8. How can I find out who posted the statement?

Unless the person posting the comment indicates his or her email address or other contact details on the website, it is often very difficult to determine their identity. It may however be possible to obtain an order from the court requiring the web host to  disclose to you the identity of the individual or their IP address.

9. Can I get the website closed down?

If none of the practical steps set out above succeed, and provided you have put the web host on notice that the site contains defamatory material, you will be entitled to and may succeed in obtaining an injunction against the web host requiring them to remove the material.

10. Am I liable for statements made by people within my organisation?

Yes, an employer is jointly liable for any defamatory statements made by an employee provided the employee was acting within the scope of his or her employment and authority. The question the court will determine is whether there is a sufficiently close connection between the employment and the defamatory statement.

Wesley O’Brien is a solicitor at Bevan Brittan. He can be contacted by email at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 

Latest Stories

Law Commission includes DoLS and Wales projects in next programme
28/07/14: A law reform project to consider how deprivation of liberty should be authorised and supervised in settings other than hospitals and care homes has been included in the Law Commission’s 12th programme of law reform.

London borough approves abolition of its regional planning committees
28/07/14: The London Borough of Redbridge agreed earlier this month to abolish regional planning committees.

DfT consults on community rail plans for East Suffolk and Tyne Valley routes
28/07/14: The Government is consulting on plans to designate rail routes in East Suffolk and the North East as community rail services.

SRA to move away from 'employed solicitor' concept, ease ABS process
25/07/14: The Solicitors Regulation Authority appears to be moving away from the concept of the ‘employed solicitor’, the President of Lawyers in Local Government has said following a meeting between the regulator and local authority lawyers last month.

Borough launches legal action against neighbour over failure to cooperate
25/07/14: Luton Borough Council has launched judicial review proceedings against a neighbouring authority over its decision to grant planning permission for a major urban extension.

Minister vows to give children greater voice in family justice system
25/07/14: The Ministry of Justice has announced that it is to work with Family Court judges, Cafcass and young people in a bid to give children a greater voice in the family justice system.

Rude beers fall foul of Portman Group code of practice after council complaint
25/07/14: An independent brewer breached the Portman Group’s code of practice in relation to ten of its beers, an independent complaints panel has ruled following a complaint by Newcastle City Council’s public health team.

See all news stories...

 

Sign up for our FREE email newsletter


Get your full year's CPD for just £349+vat

CLICK HERE for more information


Redundancy iStock 000006411338XSmall thumbSickness absence - ten top tips
How should employers handle the difficult issue of stress-related sickness absence? Graham Richardson provides some guidance for employers and comments on some of the key case law.

Social care iStock 000007701832XSmall thumbThe Care Act and s. 117 MHA
Anuara Ali of Islington Council looks at three key changes to be introduced by the Care Act 2014.

Family comes first (even if they’re in Poland)
In a case relating to care and placement orders, the Court of Appeal has issued a reminder to judges and local authorities of the importance of taking their Article 8 duties seriously. Alasdair Henderson reports.

Mid Year Licensing Update
At the half year mark Paddy Whur analyses the substantial, and tinkering, changes to the licensing landscape.

Disclosure of information and the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
Polly Dyer reviews the changes introduced by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and looks at the practical considerations.

Changes to UK ‘payment culture’
Ruth Connorton and Alison Walton consider the Government's latest announcements in relation to payment practices in the public sector.

Confiscation orders and A1P1
The Supreme Court has revised a confiscation order via the right to property under Article 1 of the 1st Protocol. David Hart QC analyses the ruling.

A victory for common sense
The High Court has issued a straightforward interpretation of the law when it comes to personal injury capital managed by a Court of Protection deputy and an individual's eligibility for social care provision, writes Donna Holmes.

When the money runs out
Simon Goacher considers what might happen if a local authority proved unable to balance the books.

Lights, camera, action!
New regulations are coming into force, leaving councils little time in which to prepare for their meetings being filmed, tweeted or blogged. Olwen Dutton reports.

For better or for worse
The Court of Appeal has just handed down an important ruling on the scope of statutory homeless reviews. Kelvin Rutledge QC and Sian Davies analyse the judgment.

Sustainable development: the Humpty Dumpty approach
Sue Chadwick looks at the challenges thrown up by the concept of 'sustainable development'.

Trigger happy?
Emma Porritt and James Garbett look at additional trigger events to prevent applications to register town and village greens.

Funding charities
A Charity Commission intervention and a recent VAT Tribunal case highlight the need for local authorities to consider their legal position carefully when giving funding to charities, writes Richard Auton.

Power play
Greater use of existing powers could be made to deal with the consequences of late-night drinking and to target problem customers, argues Gerald Gouriet QC.

Making yourself heard
Telecommunication leases may deliver an additional source of income for local authorities and other public bodies but at what cost? Cynyr Rhys examines the issues.

Winning more business
How do local authority legal teams win work traditionally undertaken by large private practice firms? Chris Skinner looks at the challenges.

Lessons from Ireland
What can a decision of the High Court of Ireland tell us about EU procurement law and whether the UK approach to the lifting of automatic suspensions of contract awards is compliant with it? Brendan Ryan reports.

Mediation and arbitration after Mitchell
Do mediation and arbitration hold greater appeal following the Court of Appeal ruling in Mitchell? Belinda Moore and Andrew Clarke consider the options.

Article 8, the Equality Act and summary hearings
How should Article 8 and Equality Act 2010 arguments be treated when raised at a summary hearing? Senga Howells reports on a recent case.

What you need to know about district heat networks
Mark Routley looks at the opportunities and challenges for local authorities presented by district heat networks.

High Court guidance on commercial service charges
The High Court has recently provided some useful guidance on commercial service charges, anticipated expenditure and apportionment, writes David Bird.

Governance and the LGPS
Gary Delderfield reports on a Department for Communities and Local Government consultation on draft regulations for governance of the Local Government Pension Scheme.

Judicial review, proportionality and s.178 direct action
A senior Court of Appeal judge has rejected an argument that proportionality was a matter for the Court on an application for judicial review of a planning authority's decision to take direct action to remove travellers. David Lintott explains why.

Recent appeals decisions under the Licensing Act
There have been a number of interesting appeal decisions under the Licensing Act recently, writes Paddy Whur.

Sleepwalking into oblivion
Is time running out for local government lawyers? Hugh Peart, Director of HB Public Law, looks at the responses available.

The 'bedroom tax' and DHPs
Jed Meers analyses the recent High Court ruling in Rutherford and the evolving role of Discretionary Housing Payments.

Local authorities, notices to quit and undue influence
The Court of Appeal recently examined whether a notice to quit was procured by the undue influence of a housing officer employed by a council. Jonathan Manning and Amy Knight explain the judgment.

Draft equal pay audit regulations published
Earlier this week the Government published the draft Equal Pay Audit Regulations. Daniella McGuigan and Khurram Shamsee consider their impact.

Don’t be shy: Spot the risks and engage
Sophie Kavanagh considers important developments in contracting authorities' ability to consult the market pre-procurement.

Lifting automatic suspensions
In what circumstances will the Court lift an automatic suspension on contract award? Edward Reynolds reports on a recent case.

Speaking up
The High Court ruled earlier this year in a case where a non-planning councillor spoke at a planning committee meeting. Mary Tate examines the ruling.

The local authorities’ perspective on fracking
David Brammer discusses the role local government has to play in awarding fracking rights and regulating the industry.

New services from the Land Registry
Bill Chandler highlights several significant recent developments from the Land Registry which affect all local authority lawyers involved with land and property, whether dealing with residential properties or complex commercial premises.

Costs in welfare proceedings
The Court of Protection team at 39 Essex Street report on a rare award of costs in welfare proceedings.

Late service and 'trivial errors'
Was a council's late service of a notice by two days a ‘trivial’ error? Gordon Exall reports on a High Court decision.

Binding the Crown
The High Court has confirmed HMRC and other state agents' obligation to produce documents for coroners. Daniel Machover analyses the ruling.

Variation of planning obligations
Kamran Hyder examines s. 106BA of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and the new process to modify or discharge affordable housing obligations.

Heritage partnership agreements
Richard Harwood QC discusses the new power to enter into heritage agreements under s. 26A of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.

Becoming homeless intentionally
When was the relevant time for a council to consider whether an applicant’s homelessness was intentional? Chistopher Baker reports on an important Court of Appeal ruling.

The ‘bedroom tax’: what is a bedroom?
Tribunals have been busy resolving a number of cases around whether a room is a 'bedroom' for the purpose of the so-called 'bedroom tax'. Amy Gibbs reports on the outcomes.

Durham - an enlightened approach to reviews
Paddy Whur approves of the approach taken to a licence review in Durham.

Selection stage: grounds for exclusion, selection criteria and the ESPD
In the light of significant changes brought in by the new directive, Emily Heard and Susie Smith look at the exclusion of economic operators from taking part in a procurement process.

Capacity in relation to children: termination of pregnancy
A High Court judge recently ruled on a 13-year-old's capacity in relation to whether to continue with or terminate a pregnancy. The Court of Protection team at 39 Essex Street examine the case.

Green day
Significant rulings continue to be handed down by the courts in relation to town and village greens. Antonia Murillo reviews the latest judgments.

What are LA legal departments for?
Not long ago this was not a question often asked, writes Nicholas Dobson. For the answer was beyond obvious: to provide legal advice and support to the employing authority. End of!

Paying dividends
Elizabeth Warhurst explains how her council teamed up with a law firm to deliver a recruitment model to help shape a newly qualified solicitor into a public sector asset.

Data protection and child protection
Christopher Knight examines a strike-out application made by a number of local authorities over claims that they held inaccurate and damaging information about the claimant.

Biodiversity offsetting in action
Stephen Tromans QC highlights an example of how biodiversity offsetting can work in practice.

Part 1 of the Care Act and local authorities
The Government has published regulations and guidance addressing the obligations councils will have under Part 1 of the Care Act 2014. Judith Barnes, Susan Thompson and Rosalind Ashcroft report.

Rent payments and administration expenses
The Court of Appeal has altered its approach to rent being payable as an administration expense. Naomi Chesterman reports.

Procurement challenges - two bites at the cherry?
Jenny Beresford-Jones examines an Italian case on the time periods for bringing a procurement challenge.

Freeze frame
A recent test case explored whether the impact of the public sector pay freeze on the pay progression of staff aged 32 and under was indirectly discriminatory. Simon Lambert analyses the ruling.

Late concessions of liability
In the light of a recent employment tribunal equal pay case, Joanne Oliver considers the costs risks of conceding liability late in the day.

Article 8 and specific care needs
The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that a disabled applicant was not entitled under Article 8 to specific care needs. Rosalind English examines the judgment.

The Care Act 2014 - the key points
The Care Act received Royal Assent last month. Judith Barnes, Susan Thompson and Ros Ashcroft outline the key measures in this landark legislation.

Enforcement appeals – an important judgment
Martin Goodall reviews a Court of Appeal ruling on whether a planning inspector should have considered an alternative to demolition.

Time to think
You can agree to extend time now - but should you agree to extensions? Gordon Exall analyses the issues.

The nature of the transaction
Contracting authorities and property developers beware: “Leases” may be subject to procurement law. Stephanie Rickard examines a recent Advocate General opinion in an Italian case.

Supreme Court clarifies when property can be registered as village green
The critical distinction between use of a playing field ‘as of right’ and ‘by right’ for the purposes of deciding whether it can be registered as a town or a village green is explained by Paul Wilmshurst.

About time
Two recent rulings have looked at time limits in procurement challenges. Ruth Connorton and Alison Walton set out the key points.

Austerity, redundancy and other measures
What options do local authorities have beyond simple reductions in headcount? Bhavesh Prajapati explains.

Radiation contamination—is the public sufficiently informed?
Jon Payne comments on the Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment’s (Comare) findings and recommendations in relation to aspects of radiation in the environment.

Code of conduct v freedom of expression
The High Court recently cut the disqualification period imposed on a Welsh councillor. Nicholas Dobson considers the lessons to be learned from the case for local authorities in England as well as Wales.

Council tax liability and void properties
Andrew Lane looks at a key ruling for housing associations in relation to void periods and council tax liability.

State aid and the revised General Block Exemption Regulation
The revised General Block Exemption Regulation opens up a range of possibilities for authorities when it comes to state aid, write Jonathan Branton and Jay Mehta.

‘Ordinary residence’ revisited
The Community Care team at 39 Essex Street consider the latest 'ordinary residence' test to reach the Court of Appeal.

Remains of the day
Three judges in the High Court have dismissed a challenge over the reburial of Richard III. Richard Harwood QC analyses the ruling.

Striking answers
Allison Cook considers some of the key legal issues as the local government sector faces up to possible mass co-ordinated national strike action later this Summer.

Teckal and exceptions to mandatory application of procurement procedures
A ruling by the European Court of Justice has provided further clarity on the Teckal exemption in relation to procurement processes, writes Patrick Parkin.

Break dates, rental payments and apportionment
A recent Court of Appeal decision on break dates and rental payments marks a return to express wording for apportionment, says Naomi Chesterman.

A landmark prosecution, a landmark sentence
Andrew Bennett examines the prosecution of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust by the Health & Safety Executive.

Dangerous and defective buildings
A council recently lost its appeal over an order that it should pay substantial compensation following the closure of a pier on safety grounds. Samuel Townend looks at the options available when dealing with dangerous structures.

A boost for neighbourhood planning
A High Court judge earlier this month handed down a decision that will be of interest to all those involved in neighbourhood planning and will encourage those involved in promoting such plans. Martin Carter explains why.

Disclosure update
Natasha Taylor examines the key elements of the Protocol and Good Practice Models for disclosure of information in cases of alleged child abuse and linked criminal and care directions hearings.

Legal professional privilege and the EIRs
Robin Hopkins anaylses a recent Upper Tribunal ruling on the interplay between legal professional privilege and the Environmental Information Regulations.

Changes to Civil Procedure and the County Court system
A number of significant changes to civil procedure and the County Court system came into force on 22 April. Naomi Chesterman highlights the key changes.

Our “wet winter” and tree root subsidence claims in 2014
The wet weather last winter is unlikely to provide much comfort for local authorities when it comes to tree root subsidence claims, warns Andrew Plunkett.

Co-operating for mutual benefit
Ben Sheppard looks at how the Government is making it easier to set up and run co-operative and community benefit societies, as part of its drive to encourage the contribution of mutuals to the UK economy.

Walking a tightrope – contact and sexual relations
The Court of Protection team at 39 Essex Street review a recent ruling that considered issues of capacity and sexual relations in a case involving a 24-year-old man with mild learning disabilities and atypical autism.

Shoesmith considers appeal after High Court setback
27/04/10: Sharon Shoesmith is considering an appeal after losing her judicial review action over her sacking in the aftermath of the Baby Peter case, and will pursue her tribunal claim as judge suggests that Haringey's procedures looked unfair.
Banner

Featured Jobs

Ashford Borough Council Planning Lawyer
Christchurch and East Dorsets Councils


CLICK HERE to search all current vacancies

Featured Courses & Events

50% off LGLtv subscriptions

Sign up for Courses and Events Updates

* indicates required

Services v2

Yellow pages iStock 000009762383XSmall cropTo access details of individual advertisers, please click on the relevant banner below.

To search all entries in the Local Government Lawyer Services Directory, please click here

 

 


 Shout_to_the_top_looking_left_iStock_000006002590XSmall_98x74 Latest Blog Posts

 

 


 

Ballot_iStock_000006080605XSmall_thumb

Snap Judgement

Will the SRA's decision to remove the 16 hour minimum training requirement...


 

Irwin Mitchell 300x100